Glenn Greenwald

Not only that. Not only that, but the idea was, if you notice how slimy that was, it began with these people have no qualifications, but then each one of them was smeared with some view that... If you're a good liberal, you were supposed to hate. Like Tulsi Gabbard has spent her entire career in the US military. She worked her way up to lieutenant colonel.

She has every security clearance possible. She was in the Congress for eight years. She served on the Intelligence and House Armed Services Committee. How is she not qualified for a position in the Intelligence Committee? And of course, you go on and on with RFK and his entire life, devoted as an environmental lawyer and as a health advocate. So-

She has every security clearance possible. She was in the Congress for eight years. She served on the Intelligence and House Armed Services Committee. How is she not qualified for a position in the Intelligence Committee? And of course, you go on and on with RFK and his entire life, devoted as an environmental lawyer and as a health advocate. So-

She has every security clearance possible. She was in the Congress for eight years. She served on the Intelligence and House Armed Services Committee. How is she not qualified for a position in the Intelligence Committee? And of course, you go on and on with RFK and his entire life, devoted as an environmental lawyer and as a health advocate. So-

This is the sort of thing that I think has become so transparent, even to ordinary people who don't pay a lot of attention to this. The one thing I do want to say, Megan, is I actually do think it's a reasonable concern when you have these media outlets who have been bought by massive corporate conglomerates

This is the sort of thing that I think has become so transparent, even to ordinary people who don't pay a lot of attention to this. The one thing I do want to say, Megan, is I actually do think it's a reasonable concern when you have these media outlets who have been bought by massive corporate conglomerates

This is the sort of thing that I think has become so transparent, even to ordinary people who don't pay a lot of attention to this. The one thing I do want to say, Megan, is I actually do think it's a reasonable concern when you have these media outlets who have been bought by massive corporate conglomerates

who do depend upon the good graces of the federal government, either because they get big contracts from them or they need their regulatory approval. That has always been a problem where major corporations that own media outlets want to keep good relations with the government and then therefore might restrict their media outlets from reporting adversarial on the government.

who do depend upon the good graces of the federal government, either because they get big contracts from them or they need their regulatory approval. That has always been a problem where major corporations that own media outlets want to keep good relations with the government and then therefore might restrict their media outlets from reporting adversarial on the government.

who do depend upon the good graces of the federal government, either because they get big contracts from them or they need their regulatory approval. That has always been a problem where major corporations that own media outlets want to keep good relations with the government and then therefore might restrict their media outlets from reporting adversarial on the government.

That only becomes a problem, though, when those media outlets, when those media programs lose credibility. The reason they never used to do that is because they knew that the whistle would be blown on them and say, oh, these CBS executives are telling us what we can and can't say. And people trusted 60 Minutes if they blew the whistle. The problem is nobody trusts these outlets anymore.

That only becomes a problem, though, when those media outlets, when those media programs lose credibility. The reason they never used to do that is because they knew that the whistle would be blown on them and say, oh, these CBS executives are telling us what we can and can't say. And people trusted 60 Minutes if they blew the whistle. The problem is nobody trusts these outlets anymore.

That only becomes a problem, though, when those media outlets, when those media programs lose credibility. The reason they never used to do that is because they knew that the whistle would be blown on them and say, oh, these CBS executives are telling us what we can and can't say. And people trusted 60 Minutes if they blew the whistle. The problem is nobody trusts these outlets anymore.

So when they say corporate executives are interfering in our journalism, people say, well, you know what? Your journalism doesn't really seem like journalism. And so maybe you do actually need some interference from higher ups in order to make you start doing your job.

So when they say corporate executives are interfering in our journalism, people say, well, you know what? Your journalism doesn't really seem like journalism. And so maybe you do actually need some interference from higher ups in order to make you start doing your job.

So when they say corporate executives are interfering in our journalism, people say, well, you know what? Your journalism doesn't really seem like journalism. And so maybe you do actually need some interference from higher ups in order to make you start doing your job.

I do find corporate interference in journalism dangerous, but they, again, have made their own bed that they're now forced to lie in.

I do find corporate interference in journalism dangerous, but they, again, have made their own bed that they're now forced to lie in.

I do find corporate interference in journalism dangerous, but they, again, have made their own bed that they're now forced to lie in.

Anderson Cooper.