Graham Hancock

Nobody knows because it's not been investigated properly. It's a desert and it's had relatively little attention. We do know there's some amazing rock art from the upper Paleolithic in the Tassili in Algeria, in the Sahara. But not enough has been done.

Nobody knows because it's not been investigated properly. It's a desert and it's had relatively little attention. We do know there's some amazing rock art from the upper Paleolithic in the Tassili in Algeria, in the Sahara. But not enough has been done.

This is the problem for me with saying archaeology has basically got the story of the human past nailed down, is that there's huge areas which have not been investigated. And I reject the idea that that is a God of the gaps argument because that's not why I'm proposing there was a lost civilization. And that's all I'm doing. I'm not insisting. I'm not demanding that people believe me.

This is the problem for me with saying archaeology has basically got the story of the human past nailed down, is that there's huge areas which have not been investigated. And I reject the idea that that is a God of the gaps argument because that's not why I'm proposing there was a lost civilization. And that's all I'm doing. I'm not insisting. I'm not demanding that people believe me.

This is the problem for me with saying archaeology has basically got the story of the human past nailed down, is that there's huge areas which have not been investigated. And I reject the idea that that is a God of the gaps argument because that's not why I'm proposing there was a lost civilization. And that's all I'm doing. I'm not insisting. I'm not demanding that people believe me.

I just want to inject this idea into the discussion so that it can be considered. Taken out of context was a little clip where you asked me during the debate, is there any evidence for your lost civilization in what they've found? And I said, in what they've found, no.

I just want to inject this idea into the discussion so that it can be considered. Taken out of context was a little clip where you asked me during the debate, is there any evidence for your lost civilization in what they've found? And I said, in what they've found, no.

I just want to inject this idea into the discussion so that it can be considered. Taken out of context was a little clip where you asked me during the debate, is there any evidence for your lost civilization in what they've found? And I said, in what they've found, no.

And then I went on to say, but that brings us to the point of what they've looked for and what they've not looked for, what they've found and what they've not found. That has been taken again and again as me saying that there's no evidence for my lost civilization.

And then I went on to say, but that brings us to the point of what they've looked for and what they've not looked for, what they've found and what they've not found. That has been taken again and again as me saying that there's no evidence for my lost civilization.

And then I went on to say, but that brings us to the point of what they've looked for and what they've not looked for, what they've found and what they've not found. That has been taken again and again as me saying that there's no evidence for my lost civilization.

Whereas what I'm actually saying is there's no evidence in what archaeologists have studied for a lost civilization because I'm not studying what archaeologists study. I am very happy to use material from archaeologists, and I could not do what I do if I didn't use material from archaeologists. It's a very important basis to my work. However, it's the astronomy. It's the astronomical alignments.

Whereas what I'm actually saying is there's no evidence in what archaeologists have studied for a lost civilization because I'm not studying what archaeologists study. I am very happy to use material from archaeologists, and I could not do what I do if I didn't use material from archaeologists. It's a very important basis to my work. However, it's the astronomy. It's the astronomical alignments.

Whereas what I'm actually saying is there's no evidence in what archaeologists have studied for a lost civilization because I'm not studying what archaeologists study. I am very happy to use material from archaeologists, and I could not do what I do if I didn't use material from archaeologists. It's a very important basis to my work. However, it's the astronomy. It's the astronomical alignments.

It's the precision. It's the precision of the Great Pyramid. It's the myths of a global flood. all around the world. It's a universal story of a massive cataclysm with a few survivors who bring their knowledge to others. This is one of the reasons why I think the Atlantis story, which Flint Dibble is so opposed to, deserves to be taken seriously. because it's part of a global tradition.

It's the precision. It's the precision of the Great Pyramid. It's the myths of a global flood. all around the world. It's a universal story of a massive cataclysm with a few survivors who bring their knowledge to others. This is one of the reasons why I think the Atlantis story, which Flint Dibble is so opposed to, deserves to be taken seriously. because it's part of a global tradition.

It's the precision. It's the precision of the Great Pyramid. It's the myths of a global flood. all around the world. It's a universal story of a massive cataclysm with a few survivors who bring their knowledge to others. This is one of the reasons why I think the Atlantis story, which Flint Dibble is so opposed to, deserves to be taken seriously. because it's part of a global tradition.

It's yet another flood myth, in fact. It's the story. It's just like those 150 or 200 other flood traditions that come from around the world. And it's not enough for archaeologists to say, oh, people experienced a little local river flood or there was a tidal wave that day. And so they decided that the whole world was submerged with water. That doesn't satisfy me at all.

It's yet another flood myth, in fact. It's the story. It's just like those 150 or 200 other flood traditions that come from around the world. And it's not enough for archaeologists to say, oh, people experienced a little local river flood or there was a tidal wave that day. And so they decided that the whole world was submerged with water. That doesn't satisfy me at all.

It's yet another flood myth, in fact. It's the story. It's just like those 150 or 200 other flood traditions that come from around the world. And it's not enough for archaeologists to say, oh, people experienced a little local river flood or there was a tidal wave that day. And so they decided that the whole world was submerged with water. That doesn't satisfy me at all.