Graham Hancock

Yeah, not enough is known. And I think it's right and proper that we have curiosity about our past. And I think it's unfortunate that people, including myself, who express that curiosity... without any dogma, but simply are mystified by problems from the past, are so likely to get slapped down and face this abusive power grab by archaeology who are saying the past is ours.

You may not intrude here. We will define you as a pseudoscientist. We will call you a hoaxer and a liar. I defy anyone out there to find a single statement I've made that is a lie. And a lie is a knowing untruth. As far as I know, I have never, ever told knowingly an untruth. What a stupid thing to do that would be. That would scupper my whole work. I may have made some honest mistakes.

You may not intrude here. We will define you as a pseudoscientist. We will call you a hoaxer and a liar. I defy anyone out there to find a single statement I've made that is a lie. And a lie is a knowing untruth. As far as I know, I have never, ever told knowingly an untruth. What a stupid thing to do that would be. That would scupper my whole work. I may have made some honest mistakes.

You may not intrude here. We will define you as a pseudoscientist. We will call you a hoaxer and a liar. I defy anyone out there to find a single statement I've made that is a lie. And a lie is a knowing untruth. As far as I know, I have never, ever told knowingly an untruth. What a stupid thing to do that would be. That would scupper my whole work. I may have made some honest mistakes.

Everybody does, including the most godlike archaeologist. But I have never knowingly told an untruth, and I never would. Of course not. The interesting thing, though, is- But seriously, I'd like an example because this is thrown at me so many times.

Everybody does, including the most godlike archaeologist. But I have never knowingly told an untruth, and I never would. Of course not. The interesting thing, though, is- But seriously, I'd like an example because this is thrown at me so many times.

Everybody does, including the most godlike archaeologist. But I have never knowingly told an untruth, and I never would. Of course not. The interesting thing, though, is- But seriously, I'd like an example because this is thrown at me so many times.

Define the untruths.

Define the untruths.

Define the untruths.

It was most unfortunate. I think he let archaeology down very badly in the way that he manipulated that debate. And I'm sorry it's taken me so long to come back with the fact-checking, but it was necessary to do. And I'm very grateful to a number of completely independent, separate individuals on the Internet who have drawn attention to some of what Flint did.

It was most unfortunate. I think he let archaeology down very badly in the way that he manipulated that debate. And I'm sorry it's taken me so long to come back with the fact-checking, but it was necessary to do. And I'm very grateful to a number of completely independent, separate individuals on the Internet who have drawn attention to some of what Flint did.

It was most unfortunate. I think he let archaeology down very badly in the way that he manipulated that debate. And I'm sorry it's taken me so long to come back with the fact-checking, but it was necessary to do. And I'm very grateful to a number of completely independent, separate individuals on the Internet who have drawn attention to some of what Flint did.

One calls himself an illegitimate scholar. And the other calls himself de-dunking. And they got into this material very, very early and helped me to understand how I'd been duped by this material. Because I took it all at face value.

One calls himself an illegitimate scholar. And the other calls himself de-dunking. And they got into this material very, very early and helped me to understand how I'd been duped by this material. Because I took it all at face value.

One calls himself an illegitimate scholar. And the other calls himself de-dunking. And they got into this material very, very early and helped me to understand how I'd been duped by this material. Because I took it all at face value.

And there's also that feeling of just being patronized by the so-called experts. Nobody wants to be patronized and feel that somebody else regards them as too stupid to make up their own mind on something.

And there's also that feeling of just being patronized by the so-called experts. Nobody wants to be patronized and feel that somebody else regards them as too stupid to make up their own mind on something.

And there's also that feeling of just being patronized by the so-called experts. Nobody wants to be patronized and feel that somebody else regards them as too stupid to make up their own mind on something.

Not at all. Archaeologists have done some fantastic work. And it's really important work. What I've realized is that there's almost two different mindsets at work here in looking at the past.