Graham Hancock

And a lot of people want to cut his head off for doing that. And I appreciate his courage, and I appreciate his openness of mind and his willingness to get into this. But I don't know. Somewhere between... 2013, we were still good friends. We traveled to Gunung Padang together in 2013.

No, I don't know why it is. Maybe I did something that offended him. Sometimes I can be very unpleasant.

No, I don't know why it is. Maybe I did something that offended him. Sometimes I can be very unpleasant.

No, I don't know why it is. Maybe I did something that offended him. Sometimes I can be very unpleasant.

Get out of here. Well, we're all nice guys, but we all have a dark side. And sometimes I am very harsh and very unpleasant. I don't think I was with Robert. I don't understand what the problem is between us. He and I disagree over the cause of the Younger Dryas cataclysm.

Get out of here. Well, we're all nice guys, but we all have a dark side. And sometimes I am very harsh and very unpleasant. I don't think I was with Robert. I don't understand what the problem is between us. He and I disagree over the cause of the Younger Dryas cataclysm.

Get out of here. Well, we're all nice guys, but we all have a dark side. And sometimes I am very harsh and very unpleasant. I don't think I was with Robert. I don't understand what the problem is between us. He and I disagree over the cause of the Younger Dryas cataclysm.

Robert Shock believes that it was a massive solar outburst that brought this catastrophe about, and he focuses on the end of the Younger Dryas 11,600 years ago. I'm more of the view that the comet research group is right and that we're looking at the effect of largely of airbursts of large cometary fragments right across the surface of the Earth, which caused the Younger Dryas.

Robert Shock believes that it was a massive solar outburst that brought this catastrophe about, and he focuses on the end of the Younger Dryas 11,600 years ago. I'm more of the view that the comet research group is right and that we're looking at the effect of largely of airbursts of large cometary fragments right across the surface of the Earth, which caused the Younger Dryas.

Robert Shock believes that it was a massive solar outburst that brought this catastrophe about, and he focuses on the end of the Younger Dryas 11,600 years ago. I'm more of the view that the comet research group is right and that we're looking at the effect of largely of airbursts of large cometary fragments right across the surface of the Earth, which caused the Younger Dryas.

No, I don't see why they're mutually exclusive. I don't see why one has to write off the other. What we both agree on is that the Younger Dryas, between 12,800 and 11,600 years ago, was an extraordinary global cataclysm, which changed everything, which extinguished all the megafauna of the Ice Age. We agree on that, and we agree that it likely wiped out a lost civilization of the Ice Age as well.

No, I don't see why they're mutually exclusive. I don't see why one has to write off the other. What we both agree on is that the Younger Dryas, between 12,800 and 11,600 years ago, was an extraordinary global cataclysm, which changed everything, which extinguished all the megafauna of the Ice Age. We agree on that, and we agree that it likely wiped out a lost civilization of the Ice Age as well.

No, I don't see why they're mutually exclusive. I don't see why one has to write off the other. What we both agree on is that the Younger Dryas, between 12,800 and 11,600 years ago, was an extraordinary global cataclysm, which changed everything, which extinguished all the megafauna of the Ice Age. We agree on that, and we agree that it likely wiped out a lost civilization of the Ice Age as well.

We disagree on the mechanism, but I don't see why we shouldn't be friends for that. So, Robert, if you're listening... If you're listening, please, let's work together because we have many common enemies. And this is one of the problems with the alternative side is that there's a lot of infighting in the alternative side and everybody's scrambling for their own bit of turf.

We disagree on the mechanism, but I don't see why we shouldn't be friends for that. So, Robert, if you're listening... If you're listening, please, let's work together because we have many common enemies. And this is one of the problems with the alternative side is that there's a lot of infighting in the alternative side and everybody's scrambling for their own bit of turf.

We disagree on the mechanism, but I don't see why we shouldn't be friends for that. So, Robert, if you're listening... If you're listening, please, let's work together because we have many common enemies. And this is one of the problems with the alternative side is that there's a lot of infighting in the alternative side and everybody's scrambling for their own bit of turf.

Whereas the archaeological side, they're very unified in terms of attacking what they call pseudo-archaeology. They work as a team and that teamwork makes them very efficient. We're very inefficient on the alternative side.

Whereas the archaeological side, they're very unified in terms of attacking what they call pseudo-archaeology. They work as a team and that teamwork makes them very efficient. We're very inefficient on the alternative side.

Whereas the archaeological side, they're very unified in terms of attacking what they call pseudo-archaeology. They work as a team and that teamwork makes them very efficient. We're very inefficient on the alternative side.

I'm not sure. I think Robert is open to doing television. The fact is we invited him to come to Israel and to give his point of view and he declined. And therefore he must have a strong reason to do that.