Grant Harvey

So basically what you're saying is the amount of experts that you had on the team were able to kind of instill that expertise into the agent so that the agent could then make those kind of decisions on its own, more or less, right?

I have a minor UX question.

So let's say, for example, I'm using this tool and I go out and I have it create, you know, I'm not a lawyer, so help me out with the example here if this doesn't work perfectly, like a brief on the case that I'm working on.

And I I get back a report from agent and I'm one of those like 10x lawyers, let's say, and I can kind of tell, OK, this is good.

This is good.

But this part here doesn't.

How how is the iteration process with the agent?

Like, can you go in, check its work and then see where it went off and give it notes?

Or how does the actual feedback mechanism work there?

Yeah, that's really smart to do that.

You know, right at the end, make sure like, okay, the ultimate conclusion, sure, it might be sound logic in the context of what you're doing.

But when you look at it back in the context of the law, is there actually legal precedent for this?

Exactly.

Yeah, yeah.

We've all heard the horror stories of lawyers citing fake cases generated by AI.

I think they get headlines.

I haven't seen headlines of them lately.

I think lawyers are kind of buttoning themselves up, but we've definitely seen that.

Lesson learned.

Yeah.