Greg Lukianoff

I have no problem saying that.

The school that did not do so well at a negative 10.69, negative 10.69, and we rounded up to zero was Harvard.

And Harvard has been not very happy with that result.

Yeah, and there are a couple people... Oh, Harvard.

Oh, Harvard.

And there are a couple people who have actually been really, I think, making a mistake by getting very Harvard-sounding, by being like, I've had statisticians look at this, and they think your methodology is a joke, and pointing out, and this case wasn't that important, and that scholar wasn't... One of the arguments against one of the scholars that we counted against them for punishing was that that wasn't a very famous or influential scholar, and I'm kind of like...

so your argument seems to be snobbery, like essentially that like you, you're not understanding our methodology for one thing.

And then you're saying that actually that scholar wasn't important enough to count.

And by the way, Harvard, by the way, Harvard, um, if we, yeah, if we, even if we took all of your arguments as true, even if we decided to get rid of those two professors, um,

you would still be in negative numbers.

You would still be dead last.

You would still be after Georgetown and Penn, and neither of those schools are good for freedom of speech.

All very well-earned.

They have so many bad cases at all of those schools.

A lot of deplatforming.

When we looked at the bottom five, 81% of attempts to get speakers deplatformed were successful at the bottom five.

There were a couple schools, I think Penn included, where every single attempt was

Every time a student group objected to that speaker coming, they canceled the speech.

And I think Georgetown was 100% success rate.

I think Penn had 100% success rate.