Greya Jackson

Yeah, it's two trillion US dollars in the decade leading up to 2024. I mean, the US saw the greatest losses followed by China and India. But I mean, two trillion dollars. Yes, it sounds like a lot. But actually, there are so many things that we cannot quantify, like the loss of entire ecosystems or even loss of life. And that loss of life is going to be big.

Yeah, it's two trillion US dollars in the decade leading up to 2024. I mean, the US saw the greatest losses followed by China and India. But I mean, two trillion dollars. Yes, it sounds like a lot. But actually, there are so many things that we cannot quantify, like the loss of entire ecosystems or even loss of life. And that loss of life is going to be big.

I mean, the World Health Organization says that Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause a quarter of a million more deaths per year. And that's purely from undernutrition, malaria, diarrhea and heat stress. That's not including people who are dying in floods or fires like we've been seeing in L.A.

I mean, the World Health Organization says that Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause a quarter of a million more deaths per year. And that's purely from undernutrition, malaria, diarrhea and heat stress. That's not including people who are dying in floods or fires like we've been seeing in L.A.

I mean, the World Health Organization says that Between 2030 and 2050, climate change is expected to cause a quarter of a million more deaths per year. And that's purely from undernutrition, malaria, diarrhea and heat stress. That's not including people who are dying in floods or fires like we've been seeing in L.A.

Yeah, I mean, really what your listener is asking is, is democracy up to the task, especially if we see governments flip-flopping about when some are seen as very climate progressive and others are seen as less climate progressive? And actually, the best answer I've had to this question comes from an expert I spoke to a few years ago, and he said it has to be.

Yeah, I mean, really what your listener is asking is, is democracy up to the task, especially if we see governments flip-flopping about when some are seen as very climate progressive and others are seen as less climate progressive? And actually, the best answer I've had to this question comes from an expert I spoke to a few years ago, and he said it has to be.

Yeah, I mean, really what your listener is asking is, is democracy up to the task, especially if we see governments flip-flopping about when some are seen as very climate progressive and others are seen as less climate progressive? And actually, the best answer I've had to this question comes from an expert I spoke to a few years ago, and he said it has to be.

Democracy has to be up to the task because people want to have a say in how they're Country is governed. There really isn't a good alternative. But the interesting thing about Biden and Trump is that there was still a lot of progress made under Trump's first term, you know, despite the fact that he's said things like drill, baby, drill and call climate change a hoax.

Democracy has to be up to the task because people want to have a say in how they're Country is governed. There really isn't a good alternative. But the interesting thing about Biden and Trump is that there was still a lot of progress made under Trump's first term, you know, despite the fact that he's said things like drill, baby, drill and call climate change a hoax.

Democracy has to be up to the task because people want to have a say in how they're Country is governed. There really isn't a good alternative. But the interesting thing about Biden and Trump is that there was still a lot of progress made under Trump's first term, you know, despite the fact that he's said things like drill, baby, drill and call climate change a hoax.

Back in that first term, solar power more than doubled and wind increased by 50%. And the reason that is, is renewables are far cheaper than oil, coal and gas. You know, this is what a lot of economists are talking about now, this Great Green March.

Back in that first term, solar power more than doubled and wind increased by 50%. And the reason that is, is renewables are far cheaper than oil, coal and gas. You know, this is what a lot of economists are talking about now, this Great Green March.

Back in that first term, solar power more than doubled and wind increased by 50%. And the reason that is, is renewables are far cheaper than oil, coal and gas. You know, this is what a lot of economists are talking about now, this Great Green March.

The economics of renewables make so much sense to the market and that maybe they don't need as much investment, as much subsidising as they previously did. So what I'm saying is, yes, Trump may in the short term cause more greenhouse gases to go up into the sky, more climate change. But the trajectory in the US and for many other countries in the world is down.

The economics of renewables make so much sense to the market and that maybe they don't need as much investment, as much subsidising as they previously did. So what I'm saying is, yes, Trump may in the short term cause more greenhouse gases to go up into the sky, more climate change. But the trajectory in the US and for many other countries in the world is down.

The economics of renewables make so much sense to the market and that maybe they don't need as much investment, as much subsidising as they previously did. So what I'm saying is, yes, Trump may in the short term cause more greenhouse gases to go up into the sky, more climate change. But the trajectory in the US and for many other countries in the world is down.