Hamilton Morris

Anyway, whatever the case may be, and I, of course, lean toward the more likely scenario being that he actually had a cathartic emotional release from using MDMA and that he genuinely considered this experience valuable and that he was not being manipulated.

Anyway, whatever the case may be, and I, of course, lean toward the more likely scenario being that he actually had a cathartic emotional release from using MDMA and that he genuinely considered this experience valuable and that he was not being manipulated.

Anyway, whatever the case may be, and I, of course, lean toward the more likely scenario being that he actually had a cathartic emotional release from using MDMA and that he genuinely considered this experience valuable and that he was not being manipulated.

although i wasn't there don't right um whatever the case may be his foundation then began to fund anti-psychedelic reporting and and so that was uh very odd Yeah, very, very odd. The other one is a bit more familiar, which is that USONA is developing psilocybin.

although i wasn't there don't right um whatever the case may be his foundation then began to fund anti-psychedelic reporting and and so that was uh very odd Yeah, very, very odd. The other one is a bit more familiar, which is that USONA is developing psilocybin.

although i wasn't there don't right um whatever the case may be his foundation then began to fund anti-psychedelic reporting and and so that was uh very odd Yeah, very, very odd. The other one is a bit more familiar, which is that USONA is developing psilocybin.

And so if they can position themselves as morally superior to their competitors by funding opposition or sicking their employees or the people that they're paying onto anybody that is potentially critical of them, then it's good for their business. That's simple. That's, you know, an old story.

And so if they can position themselves as morally superior to their competitors by funding opposition or sicking their employees or the people that they're paying onto anybody that is potentially critical of them, then it's good for their business. That's simple. That's, you know, an old story.

And so if they can position themselves as morally superior to their competitors by funding opposition or sicking their employees or the people that they're paying onto anybody that is potentially critical of them, then it's good for their business. That's simple. That's, you know, an old story.

feel bad for well-intentioned people that are stuck in the middle of this because it's really hard. Because I know that many well-intentioned people have gotten caught up in it. Like there's an interesting story in the New York Times where they're kind of covering some of these things and you can tell that the journalist who I've spoken with a tiny bit, just bought the story.

feel bad for well-intentioned people that are stuck in the middle of this because it's really hard. Because I know that many well-intentioned people have gotten caught up in it. Like there's an interesting story in the New York Times where they're kind of covering some of these things and you can tell that the journalist who I've spoken with a tiny bit, just bought the story.

feel bad for well-intentioned people that are stuck in the middle of this because it's really hard. Because I know that many well-intentioned people have gotten caught up in it. Like there's an interesting story in the New York Times where they're kind of covering some of these things and you can tell that the journalist who I've spoken with a tiny bit, just bought the story.

They're photographing one of the representatives of the pharmaceutical company, but they never mentioned that he's even an employee or an executive at the pharmaceutical company. It's pretty weird. How did that happen? I guess they didn't

They're photographing one of the representatives of the pharmaceutical company, but they never mentioned that he's even an employee or an executive at the pharmaceutical company. It's pretty weird. How did that happen? I guess they didn't

They're photographing one of the representatives of the pharmaceutical company, but they never mentioned that he's even an employee or an executive at the pharmaceutical company. It's pretty weird. How did that happen? I guess they didn't

ask or whatever and then they and they're they're very good at creating these fake things that they've done to help people that sound good until you really think about it like they'll say oh you know well we've done this amazing work we actually were able to shoot down a patent for viagra and mdma as a combination therapy and you think wow and you think like oh thank you so much for your what's wrong with viagra mixed with mdma it sounds like an amazing drug okay so you get it yeah

ask or whatever and then they and they're they're very good at creating these fake things that they've done to help people that sound good until you really think about it like they'll say oh you know well we've done this amazing work we actually were able to shoot down a patent for viagra and mdma as a combination therapy and you think wow and you think like oh thank you so much for your what's wrong with viagra mixed with mdma it sounds like an amazing drug okay so you get it yeah

ask or whatever and then they and they're they're very good at creating these fake things that they've done to help people that sound good until you really think about it like they'll say oh you know well we've done this amazing work we actually were able to shoot down a patent for viagra and mdma as a combination therapy and you think wow and you think like oh thank you so much for your what's wrong with viagra mixed with mdma it sounds like an amazing drug okay so you get it yeah

I mean, they're saying, oh, it's not a sufficiently novel invention, therefore it shouldn't be patentable. But it's like, what have you even achieved here? This is not a thing that exists. You just prevented someone from developing this as a medicine. Nobody has been helped by this in any way.

I mean, they're saying, oh, it's not a sufficiently novel invention, therefore it shouldn't be patentable. But it's like, what have you even achieved here? This is not a thing that exists. You just prevented someone from developing this as a medicine. Nobody has been helped by this in any way.