Hamilton Morris

Would they know that there are additional layers to fentanyl as a tool of propaganda or would they just look at the superficial take on this that fentanyl was a problem? Would they understand all of the legal pharmacological complexity involved in all of this? Maybe not.

And so I always have avoided these debates about ancient practices because I feel that it is so hard to understand what is going on right now that what hope could I possibly have of understanding what was happening thousands of years ago?

And so I always have avoided these debates about ancient practices because I feel that it is so hard to understand what is going on right now that what hope could I possibly have of understanding what was happening thousands of years ago?

And so I always have avoided these debates about ancient practices because I feel that it is so hard to understand what is going on right now that what hope could I possibly have of understanding what was happening thousands of years ago?

It's extremely interesting. And it also speaks to a sort of tension that's become... prevalent in our culture, which is I like to talk to people even if they have really weird beliefs that I don't agree with or whatever. I just think it's interesting to talk to somebody and hear their perspective. And it can be an exercise in critical thinking. It can be an encouragement.

It's extremely interesting. And it also speaks to a sort of tension that's become... prevalent in our culture, which is I like to talk to people even if they have really weird beliefs that I don't agree with or whatever. I just think it's interesting to talk to somebody and hear their perspective. And it can be an exercise in critical thinking. It can be an encouragement.

It's extremely interesting. And it also speaks to a sort of tension that's become... prevalent in our culture, which is I like to talk to people even if they have really weird beliefs that I don't agree with or whatever. I just think it's interesting to talk to somebody and hear their perspective. And it can be an exercise in critical thinking. It can be an encouragement.

to evaluate the evidence on your own and try to understand why he believes this and why it may be true or may not be true. And I think that's all good, but we in general have this, like there's this idea of platforming, like you, by even speaking to somebody, this is a tacit endorsement of their character and all of their beliefs. And so you should only speak to good people who you agree with.

to evaluate the evidence on your own and try to understand why he believes this and why it may be true or may not be true. And I think that's all good, but we in general have this, like there's this idea of platforming, like you, by even speaking to somebody, this is a tacit endorsement of their character and all of their beliefs. And so you should only speak to good people who you agree with.

to evaluate the evidence on your own and try to understand why he believes this and why it may be true or may not be true. And I think that's all good, but we in general have this, like there's this idea of platforming, like you, by even speaking to somebody, this is a tacit endorsement of their character and all of their beliefs. And so you should only speak to good people who you agree with.

And any deviation from that represents some kind of uh, danger to a free society. That's a bad road to go down. Um, and I think, yeah, I think in general, even if somebody has beliefs that are wrong, there's a lot that can be learned from it. That's interesting. I don't know, again, with, Hillman, I think he's so fascinating.

And any deviation from that represents some kind of uh, danger to a free society. That's a bad road to go down. Um, and I think, yeah, I think in general, even if somebody has beliefs that are wrong, there's a lot that can be learned from it. That's interesting. I don't know, again, with, Hillman, I think he's so fascinating.

And any deviation from that represents some kind of uh, danger to a free society. That's a bad road to go down. Um, and I think, yeah, I think in general, even if somebody has beliefs that are wrong, there's a lot that can be learned from it. That's interesting. I don't know, again, with, Hillman, I think he's so fascinating.

I just don't have the time to even attempt to fact check most of the claims that he's making. I did a little bit and it seemed like, what is this word? Lacedace. Lacedace was a trafficker or a pirate.

I just don't have the time to even attempt to fact check most of the claims that he's making. I did a little bit and it seemed like, what is this word? Lacedace. Lacedace was a trafficker or a pirate.

I just don't have the time to even attempt to fact check most of the claims that he's making. I did a little bit and it seemed like, what is this word? Lacedace. Lacedace was a trafficker or a pirate.

Right. So it seems that that translation of the word is child trafficker is at the very least non-standard. Right.

Right. So it seems that that translation of the word is child trafficker is at the very least non-standard. Right.

Right. So it seems that that translation of the word is child trafficker is at the very least non-standard. Right.

Right, right, right. And then, of course, the opposite is also true, where you have one group of scholars that believe in Christianity and will have a bias in that direction. And then you have Hillman.