Hamilton Morris

Right, right, right. And then, of course, the opposite is also true, where you have one group of scholars that believe in Christianity and will have a bias in that direction. And then you have Hillman.

Right, right, right. And then, of course, the opposite is also true, where you have one group of scholars that believe in Christianity and will have a bias in that direction. And then you have Hillman.

Who's, I believe, satanic.

Who's, I believe, satanic.

Who's, I believe, satanic.

It's interesting. Yeah. I don't know enough about this to say, but I could see, I mean, are you, are you familiar with the origin of consciousness and the breakdown of the bicameral mind? Do you know about this?

It's interesting. Yeah. I don't know enough about this to say, but I could see, I mean, are you, are you familiar with the origin of consciousness and the breakdown of the bicameral mind? Do you know about this?

It's interesting. Yeah. I don't know enough about this to say, but I could see, I mean, are you, are you familiar with the origin of consciousness and the breakdown of the bicameral mind? Do you know about this?

I mean, it's an interesting idea exclusively from this perspective of thinking about... It's interesting in general, but this perspective of thinking that even the way that we conceptualize something like our own consciousness or sense of self or internal monologue could be totally different, that every aspect of our consciousness could have been so different from the way it currently exists on the basis of different religious beliefs.

I mean, it's an interesting idea exclusively from this perspective of thinking about... It's interesting in general, but this perspective of thinking that even the way that we conceptualize something like our own consciousness or sense of self or internal monologue could be totally different, that every aspect of our consciousness could have been so different from the way it currently exists on the basis of different religious beliefs.

I mean, it's an interesting idea exclusively from this perspective of thinking about... It's interesting in general, but this perspective of thinking that even the way that we conceptualize something like our own consciousness or sense of self or internal monologue could be totally different, that every aspect of our consciousness could have been so different from the way it currently exists on the basis of different religious beliefs.

And I think that this kind of... bicameralism or whatever it's called what does that mean by camera it's been so long i think the idea is that you see your consciousness as like a projection of god into your mind as opposed to a sense of uh individuality and personal agency okay and so

And I think that this kind of... bicameralism or whatever it's called what does that mean by camera it's been so long i think the idea is that you see your consciousness as like a projection of god into your mind as opposed to a sense of uh individuality and personal agency okay and so

And I think that this kind of... bicameralism or whatever it's called what does that mean by camera it's been so long i think the idea is that you see your consciousness as like a projection of god into your mind as opposed to a sense of uh individuality and personal agency okay and so

know you think about something like this or you know there's another kind of vaguely analogous idea the sapir-warf hypothesis i don't know if you know about no where it's like also called linguist linguistic determinism but the idea is that just the language that a person speaks can change their interpretation of reality and this is by contemporary linguists considered not evidence-based but it's an interesting

know you think about something like this or you know there's another kind of vaguely analogous idea the sapir-warf hypothesis i don't know if you know about no where it's like also called linguist linguistic determinism but the idea is that just the language that a person speaks can change their interpretation of reality and this is by contemporary linguists considered not evidence-based but it's an interesting

know you think about something like this or you know there's another kind of vaguely analogous idea the sapir-warf hypothesis i don't know if you know about no where it's like also called linguist linguistic determinism but the idea is that just the language that a person speaks can change their interpretation of reality and this is by contemporary linguists considered not evidence-based but it's an interesting

idea like if you didn't have a word for orange might orange cease to exist or would orange be lumped in with red if you only had red right or oh interesting like to what extent is our reality defined by the language that we use to conceptualize and categorize things.

idea like if you didn't have a word for orange might orange cease to exist or would orange be lumped in with red if you only had red right or oh interesting like to what extent is our reality defined by the language that we use to conceptualize and categorize things.

idea like if you didn't have a word for orange might orange cease to exist or would orange be lumped in with red if you only had red right or oh interesting like to what extent is our reality defined by the language that we use to conceptualize and categorize things.