Hamilton Morris
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Yeah, which is, on one hand, disappointing. You think, well, why wouldn't you do it? But, you know... He's hard to swallow. He's a jagged pill to swallow. And I think that he's actually operating in what I imagine is good faith. But there's a lot of, like, there's a YouTube channel, Professor Dave Explains. It's pretty great, I think. And he's constantly debating...
Yeah, which is, on one hand, disappointing. You think, well, why wouldn't you do it? But, you know... He's hard to swallow. He's a jagged pill to swallow. And I think that he's actually operating in what I imagine is good faith. But there's a lot of, like, there's a YouTube channel, Professor Dave Explains. It's pretty great, I think. And he's constantly debating...
Yeah, which is, on one hand, disappointing. You think, well, why wouldn't you do it? But, you know... He's hard to swallow. He's a jagged pill to swallow. And I think that he's actually operating in what I imagine is good faith. But there's a lot of, like, there's a YouTube channel, Professor Dave Explains. It's pretty great, I think. And he's constantly debating...
flat earthers and things like that and it's exhausting like you kind of i know this is like a big thing with uh graham hancock for example where he's he's like getting angry at egyptologists that don't want to debate him but it's exhausting i'm not talking about graham hancock specifically but i understand generally why experts in a certain field may be reluctant to debate people that they conceptualize as having fringe beliefs because in some instances it's like
flat earthers and things like that and it's exhausting like you kind of i know this is like a big thing with uh graham hancock for example where he's he's like getting angry at egyptologists that don't want to debate him but it's exhausting i'm not talking about graham hancock specifically but i understand generally why experts in a certain field may be reluctant to debate people that they conceptualize as having fringe beliefs because in some instances it's like
flat earthers and things like that and it's exhausting like you kind of i know this is like a big thing with uh graham hancock for example where he's he's like getting angry at egyptologists that don't want to debate him but it's exhausting i'm not talking about graham hancock specifically but i understand generally why experts in a certain field may be reluctant to debate people that they conceptualize as having fringe beliefs because in some instances it's like
extremely difficult and does cause problems and you can see the professor dave stuff i mean he he's like he's called professor dave on youtube yeah yeah he's pretty great but he's you know he's like a real um warrior when it comes to this sort of stuff like but he he goes after people in these debates about abiogenesis flat earth um lots of different scientific topics yeah and it's it's hard
extremely difficult and does cause problems and you can see the professor dave stuff i mean he he's like he's called professor dave on youtube yeah yeah he's pretty great but he's you know he's like a real um warrior when it comes to this sort of stuff like but he he goes after people in these debates about abiogenesis flat earth um lots of different scientific topics yeah and it's it's hard
extremely difficult and does cause problems and you can see the professor dave stuff i mean he he's like he's called professor dave on youtube yeah yeah he's pretty great but he's you know he's like a real um warrior when it comes to this sort of stuff like but he he goes after people in these debates about abiogenesis flat earth um lots of different scientific topics yeah and it's it's hard
It's like it's not it's a skill in and of itself that I don't think you would necessarily expect a typical expert to have because it involves a sort of flair as a debater and performance that are not typically part of their profession.
It's like it's not it's a skill in and of itself that I don't think you would necessarily expect a typical expert to have because it involves a sort of flair as a debater and performance that are not typically part of their profession.
It's like it's not it's a skill in and of itself that I don't think you would necessarily expect a typical expert to have because it involves a sort of flair as a debater and performance that are not typically part of their profession.
Yeah, it seems very, very, very, roughly speaking, plausible, maybe.
Yeah, it seems very, very, very, roughly speaking, plausible, maybe.
Yeah, it seems very, very, very, roughly speaking, plausible, maybe.
I don't believe so. No. But the idea of harnessing human metabolism as a mode of affecting chemical transformations, I think is...
I don't believe so. No. But the idea of harnessing human metabolism as a mode of affecting chemical transformations, I think is...
I don't believe so. No. But the idea of harnessing human metabolism as a mode of affecting chemical transformations, I think is...
broadly represented I mean the alchemists were very very interested in urine without question the element phosphorus was discovered in urine from urine analysis I think the ancient Romans were drinking piss in some of their initiations I don't know about that but it seems possible I mean but the idea there is that yeah there's clearly some kind of transformation of foods that's occurring one issue is that
broadly represented I mean the alchemists were very very interested in urine without question the element phosphorus was discovered in urine from urine analysis I think the ancient Romans were drinking piss in some of their initiations I don't know about that but it seems possible I mean but the idea there is that yeah there's clearly some kind of transformation of foods that's occurring one issue is that