Hannah Frey

that unlocking a person's phone with their fingerprint was actually a violation of their Fifth Amendment right.

And this was actually a case that pertained to some people who were at the January 6th events at the U.S.

Capitol.

The plaintiffs in that case had their phones looked through and the court there ruled that it was inadmissible because they were compelled to give a fingerprint and

And in that case, the court said they shouldn't have been forced to do that.

Even the fingerprint was not OK.

Even the fingerprint wasn't OK.

Interesting.

You're safe with a passcode.

You may or may not be safe with a fingerprint.

It's still definitely the case that a passcode is always upheld as, yeah, that's their information, which means the contents of your phone.

when protected by a passcode, is treated like the contents of your own mind, where showing it is your choice.

You have a right to be silent, and your phone has a right to be silent, unless you lock it with your fingerprint or face ID, in which case...

Yeah, this was like a rule of hers that she needed to teach you.

Being on being like a YouTuber, I feel like don't write anything down that you wouldn't want to put on your YouTube channel because it will always wind up being discovered.

Right.

OK, I see.

Sorry.

I understand.

Oh, sure.