Hannah Rosen

Then he repairs to the Oval Office, where he takes questions from reporters in the Oval Office. And then that night he goes out dressed up, you know, with his wife and her designer clothes to the balls. And it's like, screw you, media. You have to choose what you want to cover. You can't cover it all. And that's not to mention the things that there may be doing...

Yeah, when we asked again, what if you mistakenly deport an American citizen or the wrong person without due process, his answer was sort of a Gallic shrug of, well, let me tell you, nothing in life is perfect, which is actually an argument for due process, because nothing in life is perfect.

Yeah, when we asked again, what if you mistakenly deport an American citizen or the wrong person without due process, his answer was sort of a Gallic shrug of, well, let me tell you, nothing in life is perfect, which is actually an argument for due process, because nothing in life is perfect.

Yeah, when we asked again, what if you mistakenly deport an American citizen or the wrong person without due process, his answer was sort of a Gallic shrug of, well, let me tell you, nothing in life is perfect, which is actually an argument for due process, because nothing in life is perfect.

He says quite explicitly, his idea, if you came here illegally, you are essentially not entitled to anything, right? That original sin gives me grounds to sort of, he doesn't put it this explicitly, but it's just like to treat you however I choose.

He says quite explicitly, his idea, if you came here illegally, you are essentially not entitled to anything, right? That original sin gives me grounds to sort of, he doesn't put it this explicitly, but it's just like to treat you however I choose.

He says quite explicitly, his idea, if you came here illegally, you are essentially not entitled to anything, right? That original sin gives me grounds to sort of, he doesn't put it this explicitly, but it's just like to treat you however I choose.

His sense of the Supreme Court still is that my justices are there and at the end of the day, when push comes to shove, they're going to rule in my favor. I think when the rubber meets the road is if something goes to the Supreme Court and they rule definitively against him. Does he still stand by, you have to do what the court says?

His sense of the Supreme Court still is that my justices are there and at the end of the day, when push comes to shove, they're going to rule in my favor. I think when the rubber meets the road is if something goes to the Supreme Court and they rule definitively against him. Does he still stand by, you have to do what the court says?

His sense of the Supreme Court still is that my justices are there and at the end of the day, when push comes to shove, they're going to rule in my favor. I think when the rubber meets the road is if something goes to the Supreme Court and they rule definitively against him. Does he still stand by, you have to do what the court says?

But the clearest definition, I think, would still be, for instance, the Supreme Court says, you know, just to simplify it, you absolutely cannot put any more undocumented immigrants on planes and fly them to El Salvador. And then Trump is sort of like, YOLO, we're doing it anyhow. That's the crisis. Right. And we haven't done that.

But the clearest definition, I think, would still be, for instance, the Supreme Court says, you know, just to simplify it, you absolutely cannot put any more undocumented immigrants on planes and fly them to El Salvador. And then Trump is sort of like, YOLO, we're doing it anyhow. That's the crisis. Right. And we haven't done that.

But the clearest definition, I think, would still be, for instance, the Supreme Court says, you know, just to simplify it, you absolutely cannot put any more undocumented immigrants on planes and fly them to El Salvador. And then Trump is sort of like, YOLO, we're doing it anyhow. That's the crisis. Right. And we haven't done that.

Well, you know, this is always the question. Michael and I separately had been chasing a tip we had heard that he had asked his attorney general in his Department of Justice to look into whether or not he could seek a third term. And he said, no, I haven't. So something we wanted to know, is this true?

Well, you know, this is always the question. Michael and I separately had been chasing a tip we had heard that he had asked his attorney general in his Department of Justice to look into whether or not he could seek a third term. And he said, no, I haven't. So something we wanted to know, is this true?

Well, you know, this is always the question. Michael and I separately had been chasing a tip we had heard that he had asked his attorney general in his Department of Justice to look into whether or not he could seek a third term. And he said, no, I haven't. So something we wanted to know, is this true?

But what's interesting is in reporting out that story, you sort of hear both sides from his advisers, which is that he says this as a troll. He says this is a, you know, provocation. But, you know, there's people on the outside, Steve Bannon and others, who really are looking at ways to do this.

But what's interesting is in reporting out that story, you sort of hear both sides from his advisers, which is that he says this as a troll. He says this is a, you know, provocation. But, you know, there's people on the outside, Steve Bannon and others, who really are looking at ways to do this.

But what's interesting is in reporting out that story, you sort of hear both sides from his advisers, which is that he says this as a troll. He says this is a, you know, provocation. But, you know, there's people on the outside, Steve Bannon and others, who really are looking at ways to do this.

And by the way, also, if Trump ever thought it was actually feasible, like, yeah, he'd seriously consider it. And that was sort of the answer he then gave us. So he said, no, I haven't, you know, asked for a legal opinion on this. And I kind of pressed him and said, well... Ja. Ja. Ja. Ja.