Harmeet Dhillon

We did our homework, sent prosecutors there to the ground, took affidavits, took evidence.

They buttressed the case that we could witness from Lemon's own testimony and statements and admissions against interest in his own videos.

And we have aggressively and very rapidly sought legal process.

Now, I will say it's been a little frustrating because for 48 hours,

Between the time that we sought these arrest warrants and the time that we were able to make arrests and say what the judge did in refusing to sign off on Lemons, you know, it had to stay silent.

We have certain protocols here at the Department of Justice.

But he is not out of legal jeopardy.

And he has lawyered up.

He has a prominent lawyer.

And, you know, we're going to pursue this to the ends of the earth.

So let me add, there's a couple of additional elements, which is Keith Ellison is...

ignorantly went out there and said that the FACE Act doesn't apply to attacks on houses of worship, which, as you know, Megan, it obviously does.

It's right there in the statute, and I've actually used it in court already.

This is the second time the United States Department of Justice has gone into court to use the FACE Act with respect to houses of worship.

So he's blatantly wrong, and that's her boss.

And it's a conflict of interest, in my opinion,

And, you know, he absolutely has fallen short of the standards here.

And there's more that I can say about the magistrate.

I don't even want to say judge because magistrate is a inferior officer, not an Article 3 judge.

The back and forth with us is something else.