Harmeet Dhillon

But in Minneapolis's case, Minneapolis has already entered into a state consent decree. So why are they still going along with this federal one? Well, they thought the federal one would be worse and more onerous. And so Minneapolis has publicly stated that they're going to oppose the Department of Justice's attempts to dismiss the case against the city, believe that or not.

But in Minneapolis's case, Minneapolis has already entered into a state consent decree. So why are they still going along with this federal one? Well, they thought the federal one would be worse and more onerous. And so Minneapolis has publicly stated that they're going to oppose the Department of Justice's attempts to dismiss the case against the city, believe that or not.

I mean, you would think as a city leader, your job is first to protect your city and then deal with your problems yourself, which they're already doing in Minneapolis.

I mean, you would think as a city leader, your job is first to protect your city and then deal with your problems yourself, which they're already doing in Minneapolis.

I mean, you would think as a city leader, your job is first to protect your city and then deal with your problems yourself, which they're already doing in Minneapolis.

Not even crimes. Just, you know, sort of reason to believe that the police practices are improper or inadequate.

Not even crimes. Just, you know, sort of reason to believe that the police practices are improper or inadequate.

Not even crimes. Just, you know, sort of reason to believe that the police practices are improper or inadequate.

I want to put words into their mouths, but their actions are that they would oppose the DOJ letting them sort it out themselves. I mean, it is what it is. So not every city is like that and not every municipality is like that. There are six other jurisdictions that the DOJ issued findings in that we're withdrawing.

I want to put words into their mouths, but their actions are that they would oppose the DOJ letting them sort it out themselves. I mean, it is what it is. So not every city is like that and not every municipality is like that. There are six other jurisdictions that the DOJ issued findings in that we're withdrawing.

I want to put words into their mouths, but their actions are that they would oppose the DOJ letting them sort it out themselves. I mean, it is what it is. So not every city is like that and not every municipality is like that. There are six other jurisdictions that the DOJ issued findings in that we're withdrawing.

Look, I knew that consent decrees were an abusive process. I did not realize the extent to which there was collusion in this process. I mean, we have we have perpetual monitors who have made decades of their lives getting paid. Like there's one which a city that just closed up its consent decree. DOJ dismissed it after a decade.

Look, I knew that consent decrees were an abusive process. I did not realize the extent to which there was collusion in this process. I mean, we have we have perpetual monitors who have made decades of their lives getting paid. Like there's one which a city that just closed up its consent decree. DOJ dismissed it after a decade.

Look, I knew that consent decrees were an abusive process. I did not realize the extent to which there was collusion in this process. I mean, we have we have perpetual monitors who have made decades of their lives getting paid. Like there's one which a city that just closed up its consent decree. DOJ dismissed it after a decade.

A single man got paid a million dollars a year to monitor a year a year. To monitor a city's compliance with a DOJ consent decree that went on and on and on. And, you know, these consent decree monitors set compliance rates of 95% or 100%. And it's like, it's like Zeno's paradox. You know, you never actually reach 100% because you never reached 94%. You never reached 95%.

A single man got paid a million dollars a year to monitor a year a year. To monitor a city's compliance with a DOJ consent decree that went on and on and on. And, you know, these consent decree monitors set compliance rates of 95% or 100%. And it's like, it's like Zeno's paradox. You know, you never actually reach 100% because you never reached 94%. You never reached 95%.

A single man got paid a million dollars a year to monitor a year a year. To monitor a city's compliance with a DOJ consent decree that went on and on and on. And, you know, these consent decree monitors set compliance rates of 95% or 100%. And it's like, it's like Zeno's paradox. You know, you never actually reach 100% because you never reached 94%. You never reached 95%.

And the judge is a guy getting paid to determine the outcome. And it is a broken system. Some of these consent decree monitors have fake companies, shell companies that haven't been registered with any state. Some of them have fake nonprofits that aren't really nonprofits. They sell themselves and, you know, there's never any accountability.

And the judge is a guy getting paid to determine the outcome. And it is a broken system. Some of these consent decree monitors have fake companies, shell companies that haven't been registered with any state. Some of them have fake nonprofits that aren't really nonprofits. They sell themselves and, you know, there's never any accountability.

And the judge is a guy getting paid to determine the outcome. And it is a broken system. Some of these consent decree monitors have fake companies, shell companies that haven't been registered with any state. Some of them have fake nonprofits that aren't really nonprofits. They sell themselves and, you know, there's never any accountability.