Haseeb Qureshi

It's just not important, right?

If you try to train a chess, it will become good at chess just like that.

Like it's obviously extremely easy at this point.

We know how to do it to create neural net based chess engines that are better than any human being who's ever existed, right?

We've had those for a decade now.

So it's simply a function of they just didn't bother because who cares?

We already have chess engines that are way cheaper to use than open AI.

So the answer is that they just didn't point their lasers at this because it's not economically valuable to do so.

When they do, you are going to know about it because they're going to start yelling it from the rooftops.

Now, the reason, I think a big part of the reason why, why have they not done it so far?

Because the thing is, getting blockchain-based tasks is not that hard.

It's all software.

It's easy to create an EVM simulator to simulate the state of the blockchain, to test whether or not you accomplished this task of, you know, did you recursively borrow this thing or did you sell this thing for that thing?

It's actually very easy to come up with test suites that you can build for all of this stuff, right?

So why haven't they done it?

My claim is that the reason why they haven't done it is that one, crypto's kind of cringe.

That's, you gotta admit, that's part of the reason why they're not doing this right now.

But the second reason, the second reason is liability.

Okay?

Liability.