Hayley Caronia

And there are shadows that are kind of perpendicular to each other.

And people say that this is because there's other light sources on the thing and it was in a studio or whatever.

I'm not getting into that today.

But in this photo of the moon landing from 1969, you could see that there are no stars in the sky.

And if anyone knows anything about space, there are stars in the sky.

I mean, we can see them from here, so why wouldn't you be able to see them from the moon?

And the argument is...

Some of the conspiracy theorists say that NASA manipulated these images and took the stars out because if they included the stars and it would give away their geolocation as if like people don't know where the moon is.

But whatever.

Then they said and these are this is where the devil's advocate comes in.

They say that the stars are not visible on camera because, you know, and I'm not going to get super technical here, but there are the, with the aperture and the exposure, there are certain, you know, tricks that the camera can play on the eye.

And essentially the camera is invisible.

not going to pick up the stars in the sky.

Again, whether you believe that or not, conspiracy theorists have issues with the light source that illuminates the astronaut, but the moon is illuminating.

So that's basically the argument there, that maybe there were no cameras on the surface of the moon because the moon was doing all the illuminating.

And

Again, with a lot of the moon landing conspiracy theories, and it's like, well, the average person is never going to know the answer.

The average person is never going to go to the moon.

The average person can never fact check this.

You just have to believe what you're told.