Host (Jeff)

Yes.

What was the degree of danger?

Well, I think that there's

the high degree of danger, and it says mitigation will not apply for any intentional or highly reckless acts.

Well, I think it's highly reckless, but if there is mitigation, it goes to yellow card.

And that's where you'll hear the ref say the mitigation was that he was falling into it.

And so by using that magic word mitigation,

I think that that's where it all lets it go.

And so when the TMO looks at it, he's got in the back of the head, there's mitigation.

If that word had never been said, I think we would have seen that the TMO would have elevated it to arrest.

Yeah, I think so.

I'm just looking to see how often Jordan's actually had a game, and he hasn't had many.

And so maybe that on-field experience is not quite there yet.

I think that that should definitely be something that they should be stamping out of the game.

He stands, like you say, he's got his feet planted there.

His shoulder sort of seems to go into it.

I don't think that there's enough mitigation, personally.

Again, this is the same thing that I've talked about in the past.

Once you start applying the rulebook, he applied the rulebook correctly,

The problem is, it's that caveat of the mitigation that lets him go to the next step that says, now it's just a yellow.