Howard Blum

And it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, it came out in open court that the FBI violated the protocols of these two genetic websites. Now, how is that going to affect the case?

And it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, it came out in open court that the FBI violated the protocols of these two genetic websites. Now, how is that going to affect the case?

Exactly. And if you look at what they had before then, there's not much except for one thing. After Kohlberger is arrested, he's in a Pennsylvania jail and they do a cheek swab. And the DNA from that cheek swab matches the DNA on the button of the knife sheath. That is pretty substantial evidence. But if they can get that thrown out

Exactly. And if you look at what they had before then, there's not much except for one thing. After Kohlberger is arrested, he's in a Pennsylvania jail and they do a cheek swab. And the DNA from that cheek swab matches the DNA on the button of the knife sheath. That is pretty substantial evidence. But if they can get that thrown out

Exactly. And if you look at what they had before then, there's not much except for one thing. After Kohlberger is arrested, he's in a Pennsylvania jail and they do a cheek swab. And the DNA from that cheek swab matches the DNA on the button of the knife sheath. That is pretty substantial evidence. But if they can get that thrown out

That will make a case, it seems, pretty much a shut case to be more open than shut. And there's going to be a possibility of a Franks hearing. That's a judicial process named after a 1978 Supreme Court case where evidence was thrown out because the police had falsified information to get their warrants. The judge has not said he will have this Franks hearing.

That will make a case, it seems, pretty much a shut case to be more open than shut. And there's going to be a possibility of a Franks hearing. That's a judicial process named after a 1978 Supreme Court case where evidence was thrown out because the police had falsified information to get their warrants. The judge has not said he will have this Franks hearing.

That will make a case, it seems, pretty much a shut case to be more open than shut. And there's going to be a possibility of a Franks hearing. That's a judicial process named after a 1978 Supreme Court case where evidence was thrown out because the police had falsified information to get their warrants. The judge has not said he will have this Franks hearing.

but he has raised the possibility and he's asked the lawyers to keep time available to have such a hearing.

but he has raised the possibility and he's asked the lawyers to keep time available to have such a hearing.

but he has raised the possibility and he's asked the lawyers to keep time available to have such a hearing.

That is what she's arguing. That's part of her argument. But also at that hearing, something else was revealed, which is perhaps even more dramatic and makes her case even more substantial.

That is what she's arguing. That's part of her argument. But also at that hearing, something else was revealed, which is perhaps even more dramatic and makes her case even more substantial.

That is what she's arguing. That's part of her argument. But also at that hearing, something else was revealed, which is perhaps even more dramatic and makes her case even more substantial.

That's basically what happened. But also, if they throw it out, there's really not much there. I mean, you have to... In many ways, it was a perfect crime, except for the leaving the knife sheath behind. Consider the house was... There was so much blood in the house that it was coming out of the sides of the house. It was coming down the foundation of the building at 1122 King Road.

That's basically what happened. But also, if they throw it out, there's really not much there. I mean, you have to... In many ways, it was a perfect crime, except for the leaving the knife sheath behind. Consider the house was... There was so much blood in the house that it was coming out of the sides of the house. It was coming down the foundation of the building at 1122 King Road.

That's basically what happened. But also, if they throw it out, there's really not much there. I mean, you have to... In many ways, it was a perfect crime, except for the leaving the knife sheath behind. Consider the house was... There was so much blood in the house that it was coming out of the sides of the house. It was coming down the foundation of the building at 1122 King Road.

And yet no blood was ever found on Kohlberger. No blood was found in his car. No blood was found in his apartment. There is no evidence also of Kohlberger having any connection to any of the murder victims. There's no evidence of him talking to any of them, ever being in the house, of him stalking them on the internet. There's no murder weapon. There's no motive even.

And yet no blood was ever found on Kohlberger. No blood was found in his car. No blood was found in his apartment. There is no evidence also of Kohlberger having any connection to any of the murder victims. There's no evidence of him talking to any of them, ever being in the house, of him stalking them on the internet. There's no murder weapon. There's no motive even.

And yet no blood was ever found on Kohlberger. No blood was found in his car. No blood was found in his apartment. There is no evidence also of Kohlberger having any connection to any of the murder victims. There's no evidence of him talking to any of them, ever being in the house, of him stalking them on the internet. There's no murder weapon. There's no motive even.