Howard Lutnick
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Nick Nolte. Nick Nolte. Nick Nolte. The great Nick Nolte. Nick Nolte. We've had wonderful conversations. We're doing a film called Investigating Sex.
um in germany and we spent two months having the deepest conversation he actually inspired me to keep going further before he was just talking about the b12 shots and how it affects your your body um but we had deep deep conversations him um jeff bridges jeff bridges is an incredibly deep thinker i would love to talk to mel gibson because mel i see his mind always jumping
um in germany and we spent two months having the deepest conversation he actually inspired me to keep going further before he was just talking about the b12 shots and how it affects your your body um but we had deep deep conversations him um jeff bridges jeff bridges is an incredibly deep thinker i would love to talk to mel gibson because mel i see his mind always jumping
I have never had the pleasure of meeting him. You've never met Mel Gibson? Never met Mel Gibson.
I have never had the pleasure of meeting him. You've never met Mel Gibson? Never met Mel Gibson.
Yeah, I enjoy his neurosynaptic reactions. Meaning the way he views the world from a different lens? I love his rhythm of his mind, how it clicks. So people like that. But most people respond, you know, in a quizzical way.
Yeah, I enjoy his neurosynaptic reactions. Meaning the way he views the world from a different lens? I love his rhythm of his mind, how it clicks. So people like that. But most people respond, you know, in a quizzical way.
But when you're challenging their status quo, when you're challenging their basic arithmetic, because if you were to look at a grid of one times one equaling one, it would be a straight grid going out with just boxes on a flat plane forever. Our universe doesn't behave that way. Our universe behaves by everything wrapping itself around, multiplies volumetrically.
But when you're challenging their status quo, when you're challenging their basic arithmetic, because if you were to look at a grid of one times one equaling one, it would be a straight grid going out with just boxes on a flat plane forever. Our universe doesn't behave that way. Our universe behaves by everything wrapping itself around, multiplies volumetrically.
So what I've been talking about for the longest time is allowing our math to match what the physics work. What does the physical world look like? How does it behave? We can't throw imaginary structures out there unless the real structures aren't making sense.
So what I've been talking about for the longest time is allowing our math to match what the physics work. What does the physical world look like? How does it behave? We can't throw imaginary structures out there unless the real structures aren't making sense.
And the structures that they have as straight lines, platonic solids, they've been wrong from the beginning because there are no straight lines. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The greater the action, the greater the reaction. The greater the reaction, the greater the resistance. The greater the resistance, the greater the curvature, which means everything is curved.
And the structures that they have as straight lines, platonic solids, they've been wrong from the beginning because there are no straight lines. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The greater the action, the greater the reaction. The greater the reaction, the greater the resistance. The greater the resistance, the greater the curvature, which means everything is curved.
So measuring the universe with straight lines and with flat planes is an illogical and irrational thing to do if you're measuring curved, living, moving reality. And that is what they refuse to change. They've stopped believing that the world is flat, but they're still using flat mechanics to describe the universe.
So measuring the universe with straight lines and with flat planes is an illogical and irrational thing to do if you're measuring curved, living, moving reality. And that is what they refuse to change. They've stopped believing that the world is flat, but they're still using flat mechanics to describe the universe.
Well, I gave Eric a great deal of grace. You know, he was a little rude and cut me off a lot of times, but that's, that's the nature of being in the position of authority. Um, I had hoped that he would evaluate the geometry I gave him. I showed him, I went to his house two days later and we did, we had dinner and I took buckets of, of proof of geometry, um,
Well, I gave Eric a great deal of grace. You know, he was a little rude and cut me off a lot of times, but that's, that's the nature of being in the position of authority. Um, I had hoped that he would evaluate the geometry I gave him. I showed him, I went to his house two days later and we did, we had dinner and I took buckets of, of proof of geometry, um,
of all the linchpins and their configurations, all the wave conjugations and their configurations. The wave conjugations, so you understand, is the electric part of the world, is how plasma is the contractive part. All shapes are the expansive stuff that describes radiation's work. The linchpin is the constitution between the two. It's the friend.
of all the linchpins and their configurations, all the wave conjugations and their configurations. The wave conjugations, so you understand, is the electric part of the world, is how plasma is the contractive part. All shapes are the expansive stuff that describes radiation's work. The linchpin is the constitution between the two. It's the friend.
It's the translator between the big and the little. And I took all these things to his house. I thought he would evaluate them. I thought he would send them throughout his friends. And then I watched him go on Piers Morgan and literally say that 99% of everything I said was bathwater, was bullshit. The Howard comma. He said that afterwards? Yeah, he said this. Before you guys getting on together.