Howard Lutnick

The discharge electricity, the devitalized electricity, is what we're calling this electron or this magnetism, and they're seeing it as a particle when it's just a waveform. It's a pressure condition. It's a resonant thing that can be manipulated by other frequencies, that you don't need actual force, but you can create the conditions to change and affect a waveform.

Instead of having everything being both positive, having both attractors and detractive things, it's a dipole. It's not a monopole in the way they're seeing it. How can something, this is something that always got me, how can you can say something is charged, positively charged, how can it be negatively charged? How can you negatively charge something? A negative charge is a discharge.

Instead of having everything being both positive, having both attractors and detractive things, it's a dipole. It's not a monopole in the way they're seeing it. How can something, this is something that always got me, how can you can say something is charged, positively charged, how can it be negatively charged? How can you negatively charge something? A negative charge is a discharge.

It means that it's coming out of it in comparison to attracting into it. So their entire terms of a negatively charged particle is wrong. It's a discharging particle.

It means that it's coming out of it in comparison to attracting into it. So their entire terms of a negatively charged particle is wrong. It's a discharging particle.

Two negative charge particles? Two negative charge particles that come together and make a positive.

Two negative charge particles? Two negative charge particles that come together and make a positive.

No. Negative things are always going to push each other away. They're always going to push each other away.

No. Negative things are always going to push each other away. They're always going to push each other away.

It cannot. And think about Kirchhoff's law regarding the black body. Now, this is where Planck, if you could look up Kirchhoff, this is where the Planck model came from. Max Planck was working off of his model. And part of the radiation from Kirchhoff's law was that a black body

It cannot. And think about Kirchhoff's law regarding the black body. Now, this is where Planck, if you could look up Kirchhoff, this is where the Planck model came from. Max Planck was working off of his model. And part of the radiation from Kirchhoff's law was that a black body

it's always going to radiate into these individual cavities, and these cavities are not going to be dependent on the temperature of the walls. They're going to be dependent upon the temperature of what came in there. That was all wrong. Kirchhoff's entire law is wrong, and that's what Planck was based off of. But you look at the Planck model and think about...

it's always going to radiate into these individual cavities, and these cavities are not going to be dependent on the temperature of the walls. They're going to be dependent upon the temperature of what came in there. That was all wrong. Kirchhoff's entire law is wrong, and that's what Planck was based off of. But you look at the Planck model and think about...

It talks about if you want to do a Planck charge and all of these things, you have to use gravity. Gravity is included in there, and the speed of light is included in there. But gravity at the Planck charge, at the Planck point, is not supposed to be in effect. When you get down to the quantum area, gravity is not something that's able to affect those small areas.

It talks about if you want to do a Planck charge and all of these things, you have to use gravity. Gravity is included in there, and the speed of light is included in there. But gravity at the Planck charge, at the Planck point, is not supposed to be in effect. When you get down to the quantum area, gravity is not something that's able to affect those small areas.

So why is gravity part of Planck's... Constant. Or the speed of light, which we know changes constantly depending upon the medium that it's going in there. So having the speed of light as a constant, having gravity as a constant, and Planck's charge lets you know that this is the Planck's charge, that Planck's entire Planck number. is false because they've changed the speed of light.

So why is gravity part of Planck's... Constant. Or the speed of light, which we know changes constantly depending upon the medium that it's going in there. So having the speed of light as a constant, having gravity as a constant, and Planck's charge lets you know that this is the Planck's charge, that Planck's entire Planck number. is false because they've changed the speed of light.

Now they've attached it to another thing so that the speed of light doesn't fluctuate. They've attached it to the measurement itself, so it's always going to be the measurement. That's wrong. That's fudgery. Rupert Sheldrake talked about that and about morphisms with the speed of light being fudged and changed. So all of their principles are seemingly fudged.

Now they've attached it to another thing so that the speed of light doesn't fluctuate. They've attached it to the measurement itself, so it's always going to be the measurement. That's wrong. That's fudgery. Rupert Sheldrake talked about that and about morphisms with the speed of light being fudged and changed. So all of their principles are seemingly fudged.

Who has questioned this over the years? Like what scientists? Dirac, Feynman, all of them questioned it. That's what they were like. All of this renormalization makes this stuff bad.