Howard Lutnick

which I can't wait till you get a chance to look at and go through. But that's why I was asking you guys, please put it into your AI and see what the AI says, because the AI says, all of the AI says, all it's lacking now is being verified, that we've actually solved the problem.

But what that allows us to do now is being able to move in space because we can predict where these orbits are going to go. It's no longer a chaos-based world because now the world is based on harmony. It can be predicted, and they've made money from the loss and from the lack of understanding, and we are able to solve the Heisenberg problem.

But what that allows us to do now is being able to move in space because we can predict where these orbits are going to go. It's no longer a chaos-based world because now the world is based on harmony. It can be predicted, and they've made money from the loss and from the lack of understanding, and we are able to solve the Heisenberg problem.

We're able to manipulate the Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, all of those papers we've done from the Howard Comma having the right geometry. They missed the geometry. That's what they've been missing this entire time, and the fundamentals. Like, what's your thoughts on the universe? Is it finite or is it infinite? Or is it infinite? Of course, infinite. You think infinite? Yes.

We're able to manipulate the Schrodinger equation, the Dirac equation, all of those papers we've done from the Howard Comma having the right geometry. They missed the geometry. That's what they've been missing this entire time, and the fundamentals. Like, what's your thoughts on the universe? Is it finite or is it infinite? Or is it infinite? Of course, infinite. You think infinite? Yes.

Now, I say it's finite, and this is the reason why. If you were to... take anything inside the universe, let's say a pebble, and you drop it into a pond, and again it expands out. If the universe was infinite, that would just expand out forever and would never come back.

Now, I say it's finite, and this is the reason why. If you were to... take anything inside the universe, let's say a pebble, and you drop it into a pond, and again it expands out. If the universe was infinite, that would just expand out forever and would never come back.

But once the pebble, once those expanding waves hit the edge of the pond and start returning back, they're hitting more expanding waves, and now they're creating these standing waves. These standing waves are the first geometry. So the proof of who we are, the fact that we have shape, happens not because we have shape from something inside pulling in.

But once the pebble, once those expanding waves hit the edge of the pond and start returning back, they're hitting more expanding waves, and now they're creating these standing waves. These standing waves are the first geometry. So the proof of who we are, the fact that we have shape, happens not because we have shape from something inside pulling in.

It's the returning waves that's meeting these expanding waves because we're in a confined universe. And that confined finite space, if everything inside the universe has a boundary, and that boundary is expanding, then this bag holding this universe, this bag of bounded things, would ultimately be bounded by the very last particle, an object Go ahead.

It's the returning waves that's meeting these expanding waves because we're in a confined universe. And that confined finite space, if everything inside the universe has a boundary, and that boundary is expanding, then this bag holding this universe, this bag of bounded things, would ultimately be bounded by the very last particle, an object Go ahead.

I want to share something. One of the papers that I sent over to you guys, this was the abstract and it was the necessity of a finite universe, a wave-based mathematical framework. Which one is this? This is the necessity of a finite universe. Rob, do you have that? I do. Right there. Let me read it.

I want to share something. One of the papers that I sent over to you guys, this was the abstract and it was the necessity of a finite universe, a wave-based mathematical framework. Which one is this? This is the necessity of a finite universe. Rob, do you have that? I do. Right there. Let me read it.

It says, the abstract is, this paper rigorously demonstrates why the universe must be a finite system by employing a wave-based multiplication paradigm. the energy conservation principle, and the fundamental mathematical relation of one times one equaling two. We present mathematical proofs illustrating how infinite systems inherently violate energy conservation.

It says, the abstract is, this paper rigorously demonstrates why the universe must be a finite system by employing a wave-based multiplication paradigm. the energy conservation principle, and the fundamental mathematical relation of one times one equaling two. We present mathematical proofs illustrating how infinite systems inherently violate energy conservation.

Furthermore, we derive equations from wave mechanics to show that the wave reflections and conjugations naturally confine energy within a closed harmonic structure, linking the universe to a hypothetical or a hypothesis to observable cosmic wavefronts. Basically, proving, ultimately, that an infinite universe... is mathematically impossible because of conservation of energy laws.

Furthermore, we derive equations from wave mechanics to show that the wave reflections and conjugations naturally confine energy within a closed harmonic structure, linking the universe to a hypothetical or a hypothesis to observable cosmic wavefronts. Basically, proving, ultimately, that an infinite universe... is mathematically impossible because of conservation of energy laws.

Because if you have an infinite universe, then there's no such thing as having a finite amount of energy in a particular area. When you get to the small confined spaces, you end up with problems when you have an infinite universe. And that's one of the things I think has been holding people back, but you just said it correctly. The medium...

Because if you have an infinite universe, then there's no such thing as having a finite amount of energy in a particular area. When you get to the small confined spaces, you end up with problems when you have an infinite universe. And that's one of the things I think has been holding people back, but you just said it correctly. The medium...

is finite the potential reactions are infinite reactions but the medium the space we're in is a finite space i would think rob can we put that through open ai which if you wanted us to put one through open ai which would either one okay put that one through open ai see what that's what it says considering the necessity that's what i love let's let's get a let's