Hugh Keevins

They were two up on Celtic at Ibrox, drew 2-2.

They were one up on Hearts at Tynecastle, lost 2-1.

Against Motherwell The second half collapse Came right at the very end Because they'd gone from 2-0 to 2-2 20 minutes left to play You're waiting for the third goal from Rangers And it's Motherwell who score Mark this is the first time In nearly 26 years That Rangers have lost

There has to be some kind of review.

To finish third, to be confirmed as third in the premiership, having spent £40 million, having replaced a manager in the beginning of the season, Andrew Kavanagh has to conduct some kind of review.

The buys have not been good enough.

Is the manager good enough?

That has to be the question for Andrew Cavanaugh going forward.

At the moment, I'm struggling to defend him.

He's starting to do his job in a bewildering fashion.

Scov Olsen at Tyne Castle was bewildering.

Ant-Man today at Celtic Park, bewildering.

I do understand the argument that you can't go on sacking managers.

Well, since Steven Gerrard left having won a league, Rangers have had Giovanni Van Bronckhorst, they've had Philippe Clement, they've had Michael Beale, Russell Martin and now Danny Rowe.

Five managers in the last five years.

So Rangers do keep on sacking managers.

because that's when you get rinse and repeat territory Andrew Kavanagh hasn't been involved long enough to understand the way the parallel universe works but when the Celtic fans en masse are saying the Rangers manager's name it's because they think Rangers have got a poor manager and they would rather he stayed but the Rangers fans think he's a poor manager because of the bewildering decisions that he made I don't like jumping on it hold on I was going to say on that right

Martyn Hill's organising the team to go and get a result.

Danny Rule's not.

I agree with that.