Hugh Newman

I think Flint has. Flint's read it. I'm not sure. I mean, if he'd actually read his books, there's no hint of that. It's kind of absurd, in my opinion. It just doesn't make any sense to bring the racist card into it at all. I mean, it's absurd. I think it's a misinterpretation or he's quoted people that said stuff in their other works or something like this. It's weird.

But, you know, the point is, is that maybe Flint should write a bestselling book. Then he'll be up there with Graham. Well, he's got a YouTube channel now. There you go. He's on podcasts. Yeah. Yeah. Let's get a Netflix show, right? A million. Yeah.

But, you know, the point is, is that maybe Flint should write a bestselling book. Then he'll be up there with Graham. Well, he's got a YouTube channel now. There you go. He's on podcasts. Yeah. Yeah. Let's get a Netflix show, right? A million. Yeah.

But, you know, the point is, is that maybe Flint should write a bestselling book. Then he'll be up there with Graham. Well, he's got a YouTube channel now. There you go. He's on podcasts. Yeah. Yeah. Let's get a Netflix show, right? A million. Yeah.

Well, initially they were founded to bridge a gap between what archaeology was doing and what amateurs were doing when they were writing and presenting about archaeology. And it was all very polite when it was set up. It was all very neat and tidy. It's very polite. Now everyone else is a pseudo-archaeologist. They kind of dismiss them and call them names and things like that.

Well, initially they were founded to bridge a gap between what archaeology was doing and what amateurs were doing when they were writing and presenting about archaeology. And it was all very polite when it was set up. It was all very neat and tidy. It's very polite. Now everyone else is a pseudo-archaeologist. They kind of dismiss them and call them names and things like that.

Well, initially they were founded to bridge a gap between what archaeology was doing and what amateurs were doing when they were writing and presenting about archaeology. And it was all very polite when it was set up. It was all very neat and tidy. It's very polite. Now everyone else is a pseudo-archaeologist. They kind of dismiss them and call them names and things like that.

But when it was set up, apparently it was all very polite and that they wanted to genuinely connect with bringing archaeology and amateur work into it, into the same kind of mix. That's actually, weirdly, that's kind of why we set up Megalithomania, our conference, back in 2006.

But when it was set up, apparently it was all very polite and that they wanted to genuinely connect with bringing archaeology and amateur work into it, into the same kind of mix. That's actually, weirdly, that's kind of why we set up Megalithomania, our conference, back in 2006.

But when it was set up, apparently it was all very polite and that they wanted to genuinely connect with bringing archaeology and amateur work into it, into the same kind of mix. That's actually, weirdly, that's kind of why we set up Megalithomania, our conference, back in 2006.

There's actually an article called a really horrible, actually Dan DeDunker, he posted this video last night. Who? Dan DeDunking. He kind of debunks the academics and the skeptics. But there's a paper called Apocalypse Not, which they put out about a year or so ago, which is kind of strange.

There's actually an article called a really horrible, actually Dan DeDunker, he posted this video last night. Who? Dan DeDunking. He kind of debunks the academics and the skeptics. But there's a paper called Apocalypse Not, which they put out about a year or so ago, which is kind of strange.

There's actually an article called a really horrible, actually Dan DeDunker, he posted this video last night. Who? Dan DeDunking. He kind of debunks the academics and the skeptics. But there's a paper called Apocalypse Not, which they put out about a year or so ago, which is kind of strange.

But, yeah, so, you know, we set up Megalithomania to bridge the gap between academia, archaeologists, and the alternative, and create a stage for it, because we felt it was important back in 2006. And it's still, to me, there's just too much battling. People need to kind of lighten up, actually talk to each other, and I'm sure we'll get through and make some amazing breakthroughs.

But, yeah, so, you know, we set up Megalithomania to bridge the gap between academia, archaeologists, and the alternative, and create a stage for it, because we felt it was important back in 2006. And it's still, to me, there's just too much battling. People need to kind of lighten up, actually talk to each other, and I'm sure we'll get through and make some amazing breakthroughs.

But, yeah, so, you know, we set up Megalithomania to bridge the gap between academia, archaeologists, and the alternative, and create a stage for it, because we felt it was important back in 2006. And it's still, to me, there's just too much battling. People need to kind of lighten up, actually talk to each other, and I'm sure we'll get through and make some amazing breakthroughs.

Keep scrolling down.

Keep scrolling down.

Keep scrolling down.

What about on the left there? Committees and task forces. I think that's the one. You're going to find it. Task forces. A task force? It'll be a pseudo-archaeology task force, I'm sure. Yeah, it's not really in there, is it? But I think it's like John Hoopes, Carl Feagans, and, you know, your friend Flint Dibble and things like that.