Ian Begley

I mean, we hit Cass.

We hit Jose.

I mean, we... Should we hit the fouls more?

Yeah, it was more so the latter.

It really, it didn't come up and obviously Knicks lose.

If the Knicks had lost that game, the narrative in New York would be about the officials and the conspiracy theories.

And yeah, that that's where the attention would be because of those towns fouls early on.

I mean, uh, I took a block to meet a friend at halftime and the concourse, uh, after checking in on the Wu Tang halftime performance, which we didn't hit on that there.

Knicks, I think are plus 30, uh,

since Wu Tang has been on the court performing at halftime.

But anyway, yeah, like a couple, few people stopped me and they're like, they're down 27 and it's not all the refs fault, but those, those cat fouls stuck out to everybody who was watching the game.

So that would have been the narrative here locally had they lost the game.

Um,

Look, it's Tony Brothers.

If he refs a game in New York, I do in a half serious way worry about that because, you know, everybody was screaming about him in game two.

And the officiating has been a storyline here.

And I think that, you know, I'm the last one to

look at officiating, I think it's something that, you know, if you're emotionally looking at a game, it's something that you're going to get drawn to.

But I think even myself, people are talking about, it just seems like the calls have been more, much more to the Spurs' benefit than the Knicks.

And I don't know, what are your thoughts generally on the officiating in the series?