Ian Carroll

And the fact that it's the movement is called America first originally. And that is a stroke of genius because it is so hard. They're trying their best, but it's so hard to make what they're doing look America first.

And they're trying to do all these backwards arguments like how is passing speech laws that that like in some cases criminalize or at the very least, you know, kick you out of school, pull your federal funding if you criticize Israel. There are no laws about racism in America. There's no, if you Google right now, there is no recognized definition of racism by our government.

And they're trying to do all these backwards arguments like how is passing speech laws that that like in some cases criminalize or at the very least, you know, kick you out of school, pull your federal funding if you criticize Israel. There are no laws about racism in America. There's no, if you Google right now, there is no recognized definition of racism by our government.

And they're trying to do all these backwards arguments like how is passing speech laws that that like in some cases criminalize or at the very least, you know, kick you out of school, pull your federal funding if you criticize Israel. There are no laws about racism in America. There's no, if you Google right now, there is no recognized definition of racism by our government.

But if you Google America's official definition of antisemitism, there's a whole page on the State Department's website about antisemitism. And so how do you call this America first when we are explicitly going against our first amendment of our constitution on behalf of a different nation? And inside of those

But if you Google America's official definition of antisemitism, there's a whole page on the State Department's website about antisemitism. And so how do you call this America first when we are explicitly going against our first amendment of our constitution on behalf of a different nation? And inside of those

But if you Google America's official definition of antisemitism, there's a whole page on the State Department's website about antisemitism. And so how do you call this America first when we are explicitly going against our first amendment of our constitution on behalf of a different nation? And inside of those

guidelines they specifically say that saying that people jewish people would have more allegiance to israel than to america because they're jewish that's anti-semitic to say while out of their mouths they're saying we need to do these things for israel or like i am a jew first above all else things like that that are like what are we how are we going along with this cognitive dissonance

guidelines they specifically say that saying that people jewish people would have more allegiance to israel than to america because they're jewish that's anti-semitic to say while out of their mouths they're saying we need to do these things for israel or like i am a jew first above all else things like that that are like what are we how are we going along with this cognitive dissonance

guidelines they specifically say that saying that people jewish people would have more allegiance to israel than to america because they're jewish that's anti-semitic to say while out of their mouths they're saying we need to do these things for israel or like i am a jew first above all else things like that that are like what are we how are we going along with this cognitive dissonance

I don't know how fast it'll happen, but in Europe, it's already happening. And if you notice the language, the IHRA definition, they've always been very intentional to say a non-legally binding definition, which to me is a direct setup for where they're going.

I don't know how fast it'll happen, but in Europe, it's already happening. And if you notice the language, the IHRA definition, they've always been very intentional to say a non-legally binding definition, which to me is a direct setup for where they're going.

I don't know how fast it'll happen, but in Europe, it's already happening. And if you notice the language, the IHRA definition, they've always been very intentional to say a non-legally binding definition, which to me is a direct setup for where they're going.

And this is something that people like, to their credit, people like Whitney Webb have been talking about for quite some time, that the surveillance state is...

And this is something that people like, to their credit, people like Whitney Webb have been talking about for quite some time, that the surveillance state is...

And this is something that people like, to their credit, people like Whitney Webb have been talking about for quite some time, that the surveillance state is...

vastly like the vast majority of the surveillance state is built on israeli technology by israeli tech firms and palantir is a great example palantir funded jd vance to the nines jd vance is like his whole inspiration for politics came from the palantir and peter teal uh And so those companies, they have massive AI-led databases that are just surveillance maximal.

vastly like the vast majority of the surveillance state is built on israeli technology by israeli tech firms and palantir is a great example palantir funded jd vance to the nines jd vance is like his whole inspiration for politics came from the palantir and peter teal uh And so those companies, they have massive AI-led databases that are just surveillance maximal.

vastly like the vast majority of the surveillance state is built on israeli technology by israeli tech firms and palantir is a great example palantir funded jd vance to the nines jd vance is like his whole inspiration for politics came from the palantir and peter teal uh And so those companies, they have massive AI-led databases that are just surveillance maximal.

And they have surveillance on our phones. They have surveillance in our schools. They have surveillance in our EMS response systems. And those databases are cataloging everything that we're doing. And we don't really have a lot of transparency on what they're cataloging.