Ian Carroll

And I just got deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper into like, I don't want to miss out on some of Epstein stuff.

And I just got deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper into like, I don't want to miss out on some of Epstein stuff.

Well, we'll get there. This is all connected. I could talk about the Epstein stuff for fucking days and start all kinds of trouble for your podcast and shit. But, um, Well, I think that trouble is supposed to be coming out publicly. I don't think it's going to.

Well, we'll get there. This is all connected. I could talk about the Epstein stuff for fucking days and start all kinds of trouble for your podcast and shit. But, um, Well, I think that trouble is supposed to be coming out publicly. I don't think it's going to.

Well, we'll get there. This is all connected. I could talk about the Epstein stuff for fucking days and start all kinds of trouble for your podcast and shit. But, um, Well, I think that trouble is supposed to be coming out publicly. I don't think it's going to.

Allegedly. Yeah.

Allegedly. Yeah.

Allegedly. Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

That's how it feels. You haven't read Whitney Webb's books, have you? No. You really should.

That's how it feels. You haven't read Whitney Webb's books, have you? No. You really should.

That's how it feels. You haven't read Whitney Webb's books, have you? No. You really should.

So the thing about her stuff online is that she comes off as way more unhinged. And she's very smart. She's very smart. And she's on it. But she's now very concerned, rightly so, about the sort of technocratic nature of what might be to come. But her research on Jeffrey Epstein is looking backwards at the history of organized crime, the history of Epstein.

So the thing about her stuff online is that she comes off as way more unhinged. And she's very smart. She's very smart. And she's on it. But she's now very concerned, rightly so, about the sort of technocratic nature of what might be to come. But her research on Jeffrey Epstein is looking backwards at the history of organized crime, the history of Epstein.

So the thing about her stuff online is that she comes off as way more unhinged. And she's very smart. She's very smart. And she's on it. But she's now very concerned, rightly so, about the sort of technocratic nature of what might be to come. But her research on Jeffrey Epstein is looking backwards at the history of organized crime, the history of Epstein.

And it paints a very like we know very well who he worked for and we know who he was associated with. She has primary sources with pages of sources cited about who put him where, who he interacted with, who said what about him, who claimed what about his life. And it's like it's two full books and it's very well sourced with primary sources cited all the way throughout.

And it paints a very like we know very well who he worked for and we know who he was associated with. She has primary sources with pages of sources cited about who put him where, who he interacted with, who said what about him, who claimed what about his life. And it's like it's two full books and it's very well sourced with primary sources cited all the way throughout.

And it paints a very like we know very well who he worked for and we know who he was associated with. She has primary sources with pages of sources cited about who put him where, who he interacted with, who said what about him, who claimed what about his life. And it's like it's two full books and it's very well sourced with primary sources cited all the way throughout.