Ian Crossland

Well, I do think it's fair to say that the way that the left has approached the Charlie Kirk thing is that the higher profile individuals at the highest level, the Democrats, said it's sad.

Our prayers are with the family.

Then the mid-tier people said, yeah, well, he was a bad guy.

And this is what happens.

And then the lower tier, you know, leftist extremists all dance and celebrate.

We do see something comparable with the killing of Rene Goode.

I see it all over Instagram, sort of no-name accounts, making memes, mocking her dying, laughing about it, insulting her.

Then you get the mid-tier personalities like us saying, well, she accelerated towards an officer.

I mean, it's sad that she died.

And at the highest level, you have politicians saying, we're very sad this happened.

Trump even saying, I understand there's two ways you can see it.

Now, the difference is not factually correct or factually incorrect.

The difference is moral worldview.

So for us, we're like, she was engaged in felony obstruction.

And this is a law enforcement operation, not crowd control work.

This is where the conflict arises.

Charlie Kirk was speaking.

That's it.

So you can't compare the two.

While in their worldview, their moral structure is you're allowed to obstruct law enforcement because it's for the greater good of what we determine.