Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing

Ihor Kendiukhov

๐Ÿ‘ค Speaker
515 total appearances

Appearances Over Time

Podcast Appearances

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

I closely follow the work of Ole Peters and collaborators and believe it is very cool.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

There is, unfortunately, a lot of confusion, and it is not framed in terms of decision theory apparatus, but that is what I am going to do precisely now.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

An agent who maximizes the time-average growth rate of their wealth over their entire trajectory is, I claim, doing resolute choice in the sense MacLennan described.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

they evaluate the whole plan the entire sequence of bets the complete wealth process as a unified object they ask given the dynamics of this stochastic process what strategy maximizes my long-run growth rate and then they execute that strategy

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

The utility function that falls out of this procedure, via the agonic mapping, which finds the transformation that renders the wealth process agonic, so that time and ensemble averages coincide, depends on the dynamics of the process.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

For multiplicative dynamics, you get logarithmic utility, the Kelly criterion.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

For additive dynamics, you get linear utility.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

For more exotic dynamics, you get whatever transformation the agonic mapping produces.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

This means the effective utility function is context-dependent.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

It changes when the stochastic environment changes.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

And context-dependence of the utility function is precisely what the independence axiom forbids, because independence says your preference between sub-gambles should not depend on what else is in the package.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

So the EE agent violates independence.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

But are they exploitable?

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

And the reason maps exactly onto the resolute choice framework.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

The EE agent has committed to a trajectory-level optimization.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

Maximize time-average growth.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

They don't re-evaluate at intermediate nodes by asking, given that this branch of the uncertainty has been resolved, what do my local preferences say?

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

They continue executing the trajectory-level strategy because it was derived from a global evaluation of the entire process.

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov

The money pump has no leverage because there is no gap between the agent's ex-antiplan and their ex-post behavior.