Ilana Redstone

Then you can ask yourself the question, if you encounter somebody who has that view that you find objectionable, okay, well, maybe it's because they're hateful or stupid or whatever. But I actually also came up with this other possible explanation over here that I did on my own. How do I decide which one? That's destabilizing certainty, right? So now you have two possible explanations.

Then you can ask yourself the question, if you encounter somebody who has that view that you find objectionable, okay, well, maybe it's because they're hateful or stupid or whatever. But I actually also came up with this other possible explanation over here that I did on my own. How do I decide which one? That's destabilizing certainty, right? So now you have two possible explanations.

Then you can ask yourself the question, if you encounter somebody who has that view that you find objectionable, okay, well, maybe it's because they're hateful or stupid or whatever. But I actually also came up with this other possible explanation over here that I did on my own. How do I decide which one? That's destabilizing certainty, right? So now you have two possible explanations.

And you can ask yourself, how likely do I think one is versus the other and why and et cetera. If you can't, there will always be some issues where you cannot come up with, there's no version of the pro-slavery argument that I think is reasonable to me. When that happens, your commitment in avoiding the certainty trap is to being very clear about

And you can ask yourself, how likely do I think one is versus the other and why and et cetera. If you can't, there will always be some issues where you cannot come up with, there's no version of the pro-slavery argument that I think is reasonable to me. When that happens, your commitment in avoiding the certainty trap is to being very clear about

And you can ask yourself, how likely do I think one is versus the other and why and et cetera. If you can't, there will always be some issues where you cannot come up with, there's no version of the pro-slavery argument that I think is reasonable to me. When that happens, your commitment in avoiding the certainty trap is to being very clear about

about what kind of bedrock principle you're bumping up against. So in the slavery example, it might be something like, I think all lives have equal moral value, or I think no human being should enslave another. And naming that principle in a way and using language that somebody who disagrees with you would understand. Does that make sense?

about what kind of bedrock principle you're bumping up against. So in the slavery example, it might be something like, I think all lives have equal moral value, or I think no human being should enslave another. And naming that principle in a way and using language that somebody who disagrees with you would understand. Does that make sense?

about what kind of bedrock principle you're bumping up against. So in the slavery example, it might be something like, I think all lives have equal moral value, or I think no human being should enslave another. And naming that principle in a way and using language that somebody who disagrees with you would understand. Does that make sense?

Well, thank you so much.

Well, thank you so much.

Well, thank you so much.

I had Danielle and Megan record some answers to seemingly meaningless questions. I asked Danielle, what insect song is typically higher pitched in hotter temperatures and lower pitched in cooler temperatures?

I had Danielle and Megan record some answers to seemingly meaningless questions. I asked Danielle, what insect song is typically higher pitched in hotter temperatures and lower pitched in cooler temperatures?

I had Danielle and Megan record some answers to seemingly meaningless questions. I asked Danielle, what insect song is typically higher pitched in hotter temperatures and lower pitched in cooler temperatures?