Ilya Sutskever

In the long run, you might say, okay, so if you have a world where powerful AIs exist,

In the short term, you could say, okay, you have universal high income.

You have universal high income.

And we're all doing well.

But we know that, what do the Buddhists say?

Change is the only constant.

And so things change.

And there is some kind of government, political structure thing.

And it changes.

Because these things have a shelf life.

You know, some new government thing comes up and it functions.

And then after some time, it stops functioning.

That's something that you see happening all the time.

And so I think that for the long run equilibrium, one approach, you could say, okay, so maybe every person will have an AI that will do their bidding.

And that's good.

And if that could be maintained indefinitely, that's true.

But the downside with that is, okay, so then the AI goes and earns money for the person and advocates for their needs in the political sphere.

And maybe then writes a little report saying, okay, here's what I've done, here's the situation.

And the person says, great, keep it up.

But the person is no longer a participant.