Investigator David Franklin

Would you agree that that person appears to be leaving a building?

Would you agree that that person appears to be leaving a building?

All right. And now we go back to phone records. Did Mr. Chen's phone indicate that he was leaving the Tremont Apartments around this time? Around the exact same time that he is seen leaving the Tremont Apartment building. Is that correct? Do you recall where he went? To 999 Creek. And is there other evidence that you've reviewed that would corroborate his travel to 900 Mountain Creek Road?

All right. And now we go back to phone records. Did Mr. Chen's phone indicate that he was leaving the Tremont Apartments around this time? Around the exact same time that he is seen leaving the Tremont Apartment building. Is that correct? Do you recall where he went? To 999 Creek. And is there other evidence that you've reviewed that would corroborate his travel to 900 Mountain Creek Road?

Okay, is this video taken from the Mountain Creek Road apartment buildings?

Okay, is this video taken from the Mountain Creek Road apartment buildings?

Does that appear to be a white SUV?

Does that appear to be a white SUV?

At this point in time, is Mr. Chen's cell phone location data showing that he is in or around 900 Mountain Creek Road? Yes, ma'am. And then have you also seen the next part of this video that shows what looks like or has been testified to a Prius pulling into this parking lot?

At this point in time, is Mr. Chen's cell phone location data showing that he is in or around 900 Mountain Creek Road? Yes, ma'am. And then have you also seen the next part of this video that shows what looks like or has been testified to a Prius pulling into this parking lot?

Would you agree that that's basically a day and a half?

Would you agree that that's basically a day and a half?

My message is when the state uses them are statements from a party opponent, a well-recognized hearsay exception. Mr. Wise cannot use Mr. Chin's statement in court because it's not a party opponent. So that's slightly different. I cannot agree to open the door. However, Your Honor.

My message is when the state uses them are statements from a party opponent, a well-recognized hearsay exception. Mr. Wise cannot use Mr. Chin's statement in court because it's not a party opponent. So that's slightly different. I cannot agree to open the door. However, Your Honor.

If we can agree to eliminate the irrelevant text messages, and there's not many of them, but irrelevant text messages regarding sexual activity, and I'm only noting four or five of them, then we'll agree to the text messages coming in. I do not believe that the text messages about sexual activity are relevant to Mr. Weiss's case or the homicide of deafness.

If we can agree to eliminate the irrelevant text messages, and there's not many of them, but irrelevant text messages regarding sexual activity, and I'm only noting four or five of them, then we'll agree to the text messages coming in. I do not believe that the text messages about sexual activity are relevant to Mr. Weiss's case or the homicide of deafness.

Your Honor, I have been noted. Your Honor, hold on to this. I'll point it out for you, page by page.

Your Honor, I have been noted. Your Honor, hold on to this. I'll point it out for you, page by page.

No, he intends to tell the jury, holding argument, to go back and read all the messages. That they will be in evidence and we object to them. I will go through here with Mr. Hamilton.

No, he intends to tell the jury, holding argument, to go back and read all the messages. That they will be in evidence and we object to them. I will go through here with Mr. Hamilton.