Investigator

It's great. Of course he's having a good time. If that makes him insane, then half the men walking down the street are insane. Nobody is insane that plans a murder this way in the cover up. He knew he was wrong. And that makes him guilty. That makes him guilty. That makes him guilty all day, every day. Because he is sane, and he knew the difference between right and wrong.

It's great. Of course he's having a good time. If that makes him insane, then half the men walking down the street are insane. Nobody is insane that plans a murder this way in the cover up. He knew he was wrong. And that makes him guilty. That makes him guilty. That makes him guilty all day, every day. Because he is sane, and he knew the difference between right and wrong.

He talked about himself. It was sort of all about him. Kind of felt like, you know, woe is me, I'm sorry I got caught.

He talked about himself. It was sort of all about him. Kind of felt like, you know, woe is me, I'm sorry I got caught.

In layman's terms, if you help, you can be charged like the person that did it.

In layman's terms, if you help, you can be charged like the person that did it.

You hit her with an array of charges. Correct. We charged her with murder, obstruction, false statements, perjury.

You hit her with an array of charges. Correct. We charged her with murder, obstruction, false statements, perjury.

Yeah. I have some very strong circumstantial evidence, right? She's calling the murderer who she happens to be having an affair with moments after she finds out that her husband is shot. And then the night before the murder, there was a search on the computer for death benefits.

Yeah. I have some very strong circumstantial evidence, right? She's calling the murderer who she happens to be having an affair with moments after she finds out that her husband is shot. And then the night before the murder, there was a search on the computer for death benefits.

The question is, do we have enough evidence that we can go from she probably had something to do with it to she did have something to do with it?

The question is, do we have enough evidence that we can go from she probably had something to do with it to she did have something to do with it?

I'm standing before the court, standing before millions of people perhaps, asking for the court to dismiss a case right before trial.

I'm standing before the court, standing before millions of people perhaps, asking for the court to dismiss a case right before trial.

I believe that it would be unjust and unethical to go forward on a charge that I am not 100% sure someone is guilty of.

I believe that it would be unjust and unethical to go forward on a charge that I am not 100% sure someone is guilty of.

It doesn't happen very often. If you say that the prosecutor is a minister of justice, then you have to own that. It's not what you know, quite frankly. It's what you can prove.

It doesn't happen very often. If you say that the prosecutor is a minister of justice, then you have to own that. It's not what you know, quite frankly. It's what you can prove.

Across the board, we believe that she lied to police and she lied on the stand.

Across the board, we believe that she lied to police and she lied on the stand.