Inyash Brodsky

As long as they understand that I'm of a different religion from them, then it doesn't matter if we have different definitions where theirs includes magic and mine doesn't.

If we're both basically talking about the same kind of thing and can understand each other when we talk about the human soul.

That's basically what I was going to say.

I mean, the Jehovah's Witness religion is interesting because they believe that the soul is material and that the human is a soul.

Like our physical body is also our soul.

What if you what if you lose a finger?

It's fine.

Your soul is still in the core essence.

Like Andrew says, at our core, we feel like duelists that have spiritual stuff.

So if you lose a part of your finger, if you lose half your body, that's fine.

You still got your soul.

You are a soul.

It just seems weird to say that they're the same, but then say it doesn't matter how much of the body you lose.

They would probably say it's kind of like, if pressed on it, probably some kind of brain-centered thing, because people with brain damage would be cured of the brain damage to become fully themselves again.

Yeah, they'd cease to be themselves.

um, you had some, some things as well about like how in the past you would not have liked this word usage in our notes here.

And I think some people just literally aren't equipped to make that deep of a recursive conversation about these things.

But if there's disagreements on those things, like how can you believe in a soul and before abortion rights?

I'm like, well, in my religion, we believe that the soul enters the body around the one year mark of the first birthday, right?

My religion just has a different view of soul.