Ivan Oransky

The most likely career path for anyone who has committed misconduct is a long and fruitful career.

The most likely career path for anyone who has committed misconduct is a long and fruitful career.

The most likely career path for anyone who has committed misconduct is a long and fruitful career.

There may be something that sounds a lot less nefarious than what I just described, but that is actually what's happening.

There may be something that sounds a lot less nefarious than what I just described, but that is actually what's happening.

There may be something that sounds a lot less nefarious than what I just described, but that is actually what's happening.

You know, you wear red, you must be angry, or if it says that this is definitely a cure for cancer.

You know, you wear red, you must be angry, or if it says that this is definitely a cure for cancer.

You know, you wear red, you must be angry, or if it says that this is definitely a cure for cancer.

I essentially spend all of my nights and weekends thinking about scientific fraud, scientific misconduct, scientific integrity for that matter.

I essentially spend all of my nights and weekends thinking about scientific fraud, scientific misconduct, scientific integrity for that matter.

I essentially spend all of my nights and weekends thinking about scientific fraud, scientific misconduct, scientific integrity for that matter.

We hear from whistleblowers all the time, people we call sleuths, who are actually out there finding these problems. And often that's pre-retraction or they'll explain to us why retraction happened. We also do things like file public records requests.

We hear from whistleblowers all the time, people we call sleuths, who are actually out there finding these problems. And often that's pre-retraction or they'll explain to us why retraction happened. We also do things like file public records requests.

We hear from whistleblowers all the time, people we call sleuths, who are actually out there finding these problems. And often that's pre-retraction or they'll explain to us why retraction happened. We also do things like file public records requests.

I went to Adam and I said, what if we created a blog about this? It seems like there are all these stories that are hiding in plain sight that essentially we and other journalists are leaving on the table. And when we looked at the actual retraction notices, the information was somewhere between misleading and opaque. What do you mean by that?

I went to Adam and I said, what if we created a blog about this? It seems like there are all these stories that are hiding in plain sight that essentially we and other journalists are leaving on the table. And when we looked at the actual retraction notices, the information was somewhere between misleading and opaque. What do you mean by that?

I went to Adam and I said, what if we created a blog about this? It seems like there are all these stories that are hiding in plain sight that essentially we and other journalists are leaving on the table. And when we looked at the actual retraction notices, the information was somewhere between misleading and opaque. What do you mean by that?

So when a paper is retracted, and it's probably worth defining that, a retraction is a signal to the scientific community or really to any readers of a particular paper. peer-reviewed journal article, that you should not rely on that anymore, that there's something about it that means you should, you know, you can not pretend it doesn't exist, but you shouldn't base any other work on it.

So when a paper is retracted, and it's probably worth defining that, a retraction is a signal to the scientific community or really to any readers of a particular paper. peer-reviewed journal article, that you should not rely on that anymore, that there's something about it that means you should, you know, you can not pretend it doesn't exist, but you shouldn't base any other work on it.