J.D. Vance

Absolutely, that would be a good thing.

But fundamentally, what the president has always been focused on, even with this most recent round of protests, you saw, I think his most recent truth,

or at least one of the more recent communications he made about Iran, it's nuclear weapons-based.

We are still focused on this question of ensuring they don't get a nuclear weapon.

And here's the good thing.

Because of what happened last summer, I feel 100% confident that even if the Iranians were rushing towards a nuclear weapon, they couldn't get one during the Trump administration.

But we're not worried about the next three years.

We're worried about the next 30 years.

We have to make sure that you don't, look, what I really worry about, and I think this is, you know, obviously I disagree a lot with Bill Clinton

But Bill Clinton fundamentally decided, you know what, we're just gonna let North Korea have a nuclear weapon.

We're not gonna do anything to stop it.

What happens if 30 years from now, the number of nuclear countries, it's less than 10?

maybe about 10?

What if it goes to 100?

What if every military in the world has a nuclear weapon?

What if a crazy person gets elected in some random outpost of the world that you and I couldn't even find on a map, and now all of a sudden a crazy guy has access to nuclear weapons?

Nuclear proliferation, that is very much a bad thing and something an America First foreign policy should focus on.

That is certainly where the president is most worried about.

No, we definitely have gotten much more than we initially had.

So first of all, again, it's important to define the interest here.