Jake Tapper

Yeah, I think you need, like, whatever, 2,250 out of 3,000 or something. I mean, one problem with that is that, like, internet voting is famously unreliable. You might get people who are trolling you. You might get people who are, like, you know, or do you feel like, based on what you've seen so far, that it's pretty, people are taking it seriously?

Yeah, I think you need, like, whatever, 2,250 out of 3,000 or something. I mean, one problem with that is that, like, internet voting is famously unreliable. You might get people who are trolling you. You might get people who are, like, you know, or do you feel like, based on what you've seen so far, that it's pretty, people are taking it seriously?

Yeah, I do think they are. I would say that you need minimum two thirds. I would say it's a minimum like Senate confirmation hearing kind of a deal where you need minimum two thirds of the vote. But after that, I think it's up to you guys to decide.

Yeah, I do think they are. I would say that you need minimum two thirds. I would say it's a minimum like Senate confirmation hearing kind of a deal where you need minimum two thirds of the vote. But after that, I think it's up to you guys to decide.

Yeah, I do think they are. I would say that you need minimum two thirds. I would say it's a minimum like Senate confirmation hearing kind of a deal where you need minimum two thirds of the vote. But after that, I think it's up to you guys to decide.

Isn't it good to have like a news guy here? I meant non filibuster version. Right. Yeah. That's 60 percent.

Isn't it good to have like a news guy here? I meant non filibuster version. Right. Yeah. That's 60 percent.

Isn't it good to have like a news guy here? I meant non filibuster version. Right. Yeah. That's 60 percent.

And an impeachment trial, yeah.

And an impeachment trial, yeah.

And an impeachment trial, yeah.

No, no. By the way, my suggestion was going to be we go through them each. If it's no, no, we just move on. Yeah, if it's no, yes, we discuss briefly. If it's yes, yes, we're good. And we can talk about why.

No, no. By the way, my suggestion was going to be we go through them each. If it's no, no, we just move on. Yeah, if it's no, yes, we discuss briefly. If it's yes, yes, we're good. And we can talk about why.

No, no. By the way, my suggestion was going to be we go through them each. If it's no, no, we just move on. Yeah, if it's no, yes, we discuss briefly. If it's yes, yes, we're good. And we can talk about why.

Correct.

Correct.

Correct.

You're not going to believe this. I suggested a second category, and my name for it was additional reading. Great. Which is basically what you're saying. Basically. So it's basically like this is not criterion, but in order to fully understand the oeuvre. Yes. This is like a highly suggested additional research you do into this topic. Yes, it cannot be dismissed. That's right.

You're not going to believe this. I suggested a second category, and my name for it was additional reading. Great. Which is basically what you're saying. Basically. So it's basically like this is not criterion, but in order to fully understand the oeuvre. Yes. This is like a highly suggested additional research you do into this topic. Yes, it cannot be dismissed. That's right.

You're not going to believe this. I suggested a second category, and my name for it was additional reading. Great. Which is basically what you're saying. Basically. So it's basically like this is not criterion, but in order to fully understand the oeuvre. Yes. This is like a highly suggested additional research you do into this topic. Yes, it cannot be dismissed. That's right.