James Holland

Britain's prestige would plummet, would lead to all sorts of problems.

You are saying that you're giving carte blanche to dictators to just run amok and take whatever territory they want.

You are risking a future of

upheaval of the global order away from democracies into the hands of dictators.

upheaval of the global order away from democracies into the hands of dictators. In the West, people believe in democracy and believe in advancement of freedoms of people. To echo the words of Roosevelt in August 1941, they're aspiring to a world free of want and fear. Now, obviously, there's still some issues with form that democracy takes in the 1930s. It's not democratic for everyone.

upheaval of the global order away from democracies into the hands of dictators. In the West, people believe in democracy and believe in advancement of freedoms of people. To echo the words of Roosevelt in August 1941, they're aspiring to a world free of want and fear. Now, obviously, there's still some issues with form that democracy takes in the 1930s. It's not democratic for everyone.

upheaval of the global order away from democracies into the hands of dictators. In the West, people believe in democracy and believe in advancement of freedoms of people. To echo the words of Roosevelt in August 1941, they're aspiring to a world free of want and fear. Now, obviously, there's still some issues with form that democracy takes in the 1930s. It's not democratic for everyone.

In the West, people believe in democracy and believe in advancement of freedoms of people.

To echo the words of Roosevelt in August 1941, they're responding to a world free of want and fear.

Now, obviously, there's still some issues with

form that democracy takes in the 1930s.

It's not democratic for everyone.

Try saying that if you're in Nigeria or India or whatever, or if you're in the black southern states of the United States.

Try saying that if you're in Nigeria or India or whatever, or if you're in the black southern states of the United States. But the aspirations are there. And I think that's an important distinction. And I think by saying that Churchill is the chief warmonger of the Second World War, I think is ludicrous. You know, it's the same thing about the bombing.

Try saying that if you're in Nigeria or India or whatever, or if you're in the black southern states of the United States. But the aspirations are there. And I think that's an important distinction. And I think by saying that Churchill is the chief warmonger of the Second World War, I think is ludicrous. You know, it's the same thing about the bombing.

Try saying that if you're in Nigeria or India or whatever, or if you're in the black southern states of the United States. But the aspirations are there. And I think that's an important distinction. And I think by saying that Churchill is the chief warmonger of the Second World War, I think is ludicrous. You know, it's the same thing about the bombing.

But the aspirations are there.

And I think that's an important distinction.

And I think by saying that Churchill is the chief warmonger of the Second World War, I think is ludicrous.

You know, it's the same thing about the bombing.