James Pietragallo

So five points relate to the admissibility of evidence.

The prosecution did not unfairly withhold evidence merely because the deputy sheriff who received the telephone call about the discovery of Larry Price's body at first protected the caller's request for anonymity but disclosed the caller's identity at the trial after the caller reported

Okay, so they ended up finding out that.

Yeah.

which was the Price's type and the type found on his trousers.

So they're trying to say there's no proof that relatives' blood could have gotten on his trousers.

If he said, hey, my sister Marsha got hit in the nose with a football and shot over and bled all over me, that would be one thing.

But he never said that.

He just goes, well, I mean, my family members are type A. They could have bled on me.

Might have been them with fresh blood on my legs.

My cousin uses supers.

You never know.

You never know.

It's possible.

Any possible gaps in the chain of custody of blood samples were inconsequential, and there was no substantial indication of tampering.

During the penalty stage of the two-step trial, the court correctly refused to allow the defense to introduce pictures of a gas chamber, a gallows, and an electric chair.

none of which can be regarded as a mitigating circumstance.

They're trying to appeal.

We should have let them show the jury how bad... Oh, show them what it does?

Yeah.