Jan Böhmermann

Ich bin ins Jahr reingerutscht. Ich will gar nicht so sehr über diese Titelthesen-Temperamente-Geschichte, die hier wirklich einfach jetzt auf Wochen zurückliegt. Ich habe mir dabei aber einen größeren Gedanken gemacht und ich hoffe, dass wir vielleicht da ansetzen können. Weil was mir bei dieser ganzen TTT-Diskussion, die so Anfang des Jahres...

was so important in my peer group and where I was a bit interested in.

was so important in my peer group and where I was a bit interested in.

was so important in my peer group and where I was a bit interested in.

I totally missed it as someone who has been in and out of these structures that produce such shows for years and works with them. I wished for structural debates and structural ideas and approaches. Because narrowing it down to a personal debate in the end is of course effective in the individual case, But somehow the problem remains.

I totally missed it as someone who has been in and out of these structures that produce such shows for years and works with them. I wished for structural debates and structural ideas and approaches. Because narrowing it down to a personal debate in the end is of course effective in the individual case, But somehow the problem remains.

I totally missed it as someone who has been in and out of these structures that produce such shows for years and works with them. I wished for structural debates and structural ideas and approaches. Because narrowing it down to a personal debate in the end is of course effective in the individual case, But somehow the problem remains.

So this uncertainty of publicly legal decision-makers, who obviously do not know exactly what they are doing there, in the good as in the bad. That's a thing that goes through a lot of institutions. And then the question of how to deal with it in the future. So political institutions, social institutions like the Public Law Journal, they suffer from lack of expertise, no desire.

So this uncertainty of publicly legal decision-makers, who obviously do not know exactly what they are doing there, in the good as in the bad. That's a thing that goes through a lot of institutions. And then the question of how to deal with it in the future. So political institutions, social institutions like the Public Law Journal, they suffer from lack of expertise, no desire.

So this uncertainty of publicly legal decision-makers, who obviously do not know exactly what they are doing there, in the good as in the bad. That's a thing that goes through a lot of institutions. And then the question of how to deal with it in the future. So political institutions, social institutions like the Public Law Journal, they suffer from lack of expertise, no desire.

People don't want to get involved in it. People who have balls, who can make clear decisions, can also stand up to their decisions, who are brave, who are angry, who want to shape something, tend to stop in such institutions, which is a problem that we have been discussing for years. But is that maybe an approach?

People don't want to get involved in it. People who have balls, who can make clear decisions, can also stand up to their decisions, who are brave, who are angry, who want to shape something, tend to stop in such institutions, which is a problem that we have been discussing for years. But is that maybe an approach?

People don't want to get involved in it. People who have balls, who can make clear decisions, can also stand up to their decisions, who are brave, who are angry, who want to shape something, tend to stop in such institutions, which is a problem that we have been discussing for years. But is that maybe an approach?

Would that be something where you could theoretically say, this is how you could change things step by step,

Would that be something where you could theoretically say, this is how you could change things step by step,

Would that be something where you could theoretically say, this is how you could change things step by step,

die sich überlegen, ein kleines Café aufzumachen oder nach Dubai in eine Unternehmensberatung zu gehen oder mit Krypto reich zu werden, das einfach mal kurz zur Seite stellen und sagen, nee, jetzt geht es um was Größeres, um eine Legacy, um irgendwas, was ich meinen Kindern hinterlassen möchte. Und ich gehe jetzt einfach mal, ich werde jetzt Vorsitzender des Ordnungsamtes.

die sich überlegen, ein kleines Café aufzumachen oder nach Dubai in eine Unternehmensberatung zu gehen oder mit Krypto reich zu werden, das einfach mal kurz zur Seite stellen und sagen, nee, jetzt geht es um was Größeres, um eine Legacy, um irgendwas, was ich meinen Kindern hinterlassen möchte. Und ich gehe jetzt einfach mal, ich werde jetzt Vorsitzender des Ordnungsamtes.

die sich überlegen, ein kleines Café aufzumachen oder nach Dubai in eine Unternehmensberatung zu gehen oder mit Krypto reich zu werden, das einfach mal kurz zur Seite stellen und sagen, nee, jetzt geht es um was Größeres, um eine Legacy, um irgendwas, was ich meinen Kindern hinterlassen möchte. Und ich gehe jetzt einfach mal, ich werde jetzt Vorsitzender des Ordnungsamtes.

Oder ich gehe, ich mache... My first state exam in law school, I apply for it so that I can get involved in politics and really try to become something in a party. Or, for example, create new parties or make an existing party better. Or to get involved in offices, in institutions like the Öffentlich-Rechtlichen Rundfunk and try to design things there. Because I think few people do that.