Jane Doe

He says, you did not mention that he paid for your flight to London. She says, correct. He says, you did not mention that you met him in a hotel room in the Claridge's Hotel in London of October of 2006. She answers, no, I did not mention those things.

He says, you did not mention that he paid for your flight to London. She says, correct. He says, you did not mention that you met him in a hotel room in the Claridge's Hotel in London of October of 2006. She answers, no, I did not mention those things.

He says, you did not mention that he paid for your flight to London. She says, correct. He says, you did not mention that you met him in a hotel room in the Claridge's Hotel in London of October of 2006. She answers, no, I did not mention those things.

He says, you did not mention that you were desperate to see him and talk to him in February of 2007 when you reached out to his assistant asking to get FaceTime with him. FaceTime? Sorry, there was no FaceTime. He says, when you were asking, am I going to be able to see Mr. Weinstein? She says, yes, with regards to working projects. You did not tell the public that information, right?

He says, you did not mention that you were desperate to see him and talk to him in February of 2007 when you reached out to his assistant asking to get FaceTime with him. FaceTime? Sorry, there was no FaceTime. He says, when you were asking, am I going to be able to see Mr. Weinstein? She says, yes, with regards to working projects. You did not tell the public that information, right?

He says, you did not mention that you were desperate to see him and talk to him in February of 2007 when you reached out to his assistant asking to get FaceTime with him. FaceTime? Sorry, there was no FaceTime. He says, when you were asking, am I going to be able to see Mr. Weinstein? She says, yes, with regards to working projects. You did not tell the public that information, right?

She answers, no. You did not mention that you continued to have friendly emails with him in 2007, right? She says, I did not. You did not mention your friendly emails with him in 2008. She answers, correct. You did not mention your friendly emails in 2009. She answers, correct.

She answers, no. You did not mention that you continued to have friendly emails with him in 2007, right? She says, I did not. You did not mention your friendly emails with him in 2008. She answers, correct. You did not mention your friendly emails in 2009. She answers, correct.

She answers, no. You did not mention that you continued to have friendly emails with him in 2007, right? She says, I did not. You did not mention your friendly emails with him in 2008. She answers, correct. You did not mention your friendly emails in 2009. She answers, correct.

You did not mention that you told Harvey Weinstein if he invested in your project, you would love him forever and ever, did you? I did not. you told the press only part of the story, correct? And she answers, I told the part that was relevant to what I was trying to share. And he says, right, exactly. That's what I'm asking. So she's essentially, in my view, admitting to lying by omission.

You did not mention that you told Harvey Weinstein if he invested in your project, you would love him forever and ever, did you? I did not. you told the press only part of the story, correct? And she answers, I told the part that was relevant to what I was trying to share. And he says, right, exactly. That's what I'm asking. So she's essentially, in my view, admitting to lying by omission.

You did not mention that you told Harvey Weinstein if he invested in your project, you would love him forever and ever, did you? I did not. you told the press only part of the story, correct? And she answers, I told the part that was relevant to what I was trying to share. And he says, right, exactly. That's what I'm asking. So she's essentially, in my view, admitting to lying by omission.

Because again, this is why I call it a media hoax. When you give people just little tidbits and you don't present the full picture, it can lead them to the wrong conclusions. And if they had read her emails and the press had responsibly reported on her emails or at least pushed back at her during these press conferences and says, hey, what about this email? What is this?

Because again, this is why I call it a media hoax. When you give people just little tidbits and you don't present the full picture, it can lead them to the wrong conclusions. And if they had read her emails and the press had responsibly reported on her emails or at least pushed back at her during these press conferences and says, hey, what about this email? What is this?

Because again, this is why I call it a media hoax. When you give people just little tidbits and you don't present the full picture, it can lead them to the wrong conclusions. And if they had read her emails and the press had responsibly reported on her emails or at least pushed back at her during these press conferences and says, hey, what about this email? What is this?

You had a relationship with him or if they reported on it, everybody would have said this looks to me like, I don't know, an arrangement, a transactional relationship to be sure. And again, I don't think Harvey Weinstein is a moral man. I just also do not believe that he is a rapist. And I certainly do not view these women as moral women. Before I tell you about the L.A.

You had a relationship with him or if they reported on it, everybody would have said this looks to me like, I don't know, an arrangement, a transactional relationship to be sure. And again, I don't think Harvey Weinstein is a moral man. I just also do not believe that he is a rapist. And I certainly do not view these women as moral women. Before I tell you about the L.A.

You had a relationship with him or if they reported on it, everybody would have said this looks to me like, I don't know, an arrangement, a transactional relationship to be sure. And again, I don't think Harvey Weinstein is a moral man. I just also do not believe that he is a rapist. And I certainly do not view these women as moral women. Before I tell you about the L.A.

case, guys, I first want to tell you about Noland. That is spelled G-N-O-LAND. You would think a world where your data is locked into big tech's vault, your voice is being drowned out by the algorithm, and your ideas are being scraped, monetized, and buried would be a thing of the past. But it's not. It happens every day.

case, guys, I first want to tell you about Noland. That is spelled G-N-O-LAND. You would think a world where your data is locked into big tech's vault, your voice is being drowned out by the algorithm, and your ideas are being scraped, monetized, and buried would be a thing of the past. But it's not. It happens every day.