Jane Doe
👤 SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And they just, the teachers don't know what to do, so they dismiss it, right? The kids go home. They complain to their parents. All of these kids, they come home on Monday morning. The principal has all of these letters, all these boxes, all these phone calls, people waiting. Kids didn't want to go back to school. They were so terrified of what happened.
They had every single kid that week draw what they saw. And you can find them online. There's a movie made about this because there's one guy named John Mack. He's a professor at Harvard Medical. He's a professor in psychology. He's a child psychologist. He's one of the best. He's a Pulitzer Prize winner. He's awesome.
They had every single kid that week draw what they saw. And you can find them online. There's a movie made about this because there's one guy named John Mack. He's a professor at Harvard Medical. He's a professor in psychology. He's a child psychologist. He's one of the best. He's a Pulitzer Prize winner. He's awesome.
They had every single kid that week draw what they saw. And you can find them online. There's a movie made about this because there's one guy named John Mack. He's a professor at Harvard Medical. He's a professor in psychology. He's a child psychologist. He's one of the best. He's a Pulitzer Prize winner. He's awesome.
He's just done a lot on child psychology and he's literally the leader of the department at Harvard for psychology. So this guy knows his stuff. Und er fängt an, in diese Geschichte zu schauen, weil er gehört hat, dass viele Kinder involviert sind. Also fliegt er da raus, die Woche nachdem dieses Ding passiert. Und er setzt sie runter, interviewt jeden Einzelnen.
He's just done a lot on child psychology and he's literally the leader of the department at Harvard for psychology. So this guy knows his stuff. Und er fängt an, in diese Geschichte zu schauen, weil er gehört hat, dass viele Kinder involviert sind. Also fliegt er da raus, die Woche nachdem dieses Ding passiert. Und er setzt sie runter, interviewt jeden Einzelnen.
He's just done a lot on child psychology and he's literally the leader of the department at Harvard for psychology. So this guy knows his stuff. Und er fängt an, in diese Geschichte zu schauen, weil er gehört hat, dass viele Kinder involviert sind. Also fliegt er da raus, die Woche nachdem dieses Ding passiert. Und er setzt sie runter, interviewt jeden Einzelnen.
Diese Kinder sitzen unten und sagen die gleiche Sache, mit ihren eigenen Perspektiven, mit ihren eigenen Veränderungen, was auch immer. Aber sie beschreiben alle diesen Zylinder-UFO mit Lichtern, die in breiter Sonnenschein kommen. Wow. Wow. Und das Ding ist, dieser John-Mac-Kind, er war ein Arzt. Ich meine, er war wirklich sehr respektiert, aber er hat dieses Rabbital weitergeführt.
Diese Kinder sitzen unten und sagen die gleiche Sache, mit ihren eigenen Perspektiven, mit ihren eigenen Veränderungen, was auch immer. Aber sie beschreiben alle diesen Zylinder-UFO mit Lichtern, die in breiter Sonnenschein kommen. Wow. Wow. Und das Ding ist, dieser John-Mac-Kind, er war ein Arzt. Ich meine, er war wirklich sehr respektiert, aber er hat dieses Rabbital weitergeführt.
Diese Kinder sitzen unten und sagen die gleiche Sache, mit ihren eigenen Perspektiven, mit ihren eigenen Veränderungen, was auch immer. Aber sie beschreiben alle diesen Zylinder-UFO mit Lichtern, die in breiter Sonnenschein kommen. Wow. Wow. Und das Ding ist, dieser John-Mac-Kind, er war ein Arzt. Ich meine, er war wirklich sehr respektiert, aber er hat dieses Rabbital weitergeführt.
Er hat gesagt, das ist es. Das ist die Geschichte. Das ist, was wir brauchen. Du kannst das nicht negieren. Das sind 100 Kinder, 60 Kinder auf dem Rekord, die die gleiche Sache erklären. Du denkst, sie planen das einfach? Ja. Du denkst, es gibt keine mögliche Möglichkeit. Es gab einen Kind, der sagte, okay, ja, wir haben es gemacht. 110 Prozent. Du konntest das nicht organisieren. Nein.
Er hat gesagt, das ist es. Das ist die Geschichte. Das ist, was wir brauchen. Du kannst das nicht negieren. Das sind 100 Kinder, 60 Kinder auf dem Rekord, die die gleiche Sache erklären. Du denkst, sie planen das einfach? Ja. Du denkst, es gibt keine mögliche Möglichkeit. Es gab einen Kind, der sagte, okay, ja, wir haben es gemacht. 110 Prozent. Du konntest das nicht organisieren. Nein.
Er hat gesagt, das ist es. Das ist die Geschichte. Das ist, was wir brauchen. Du kannst das nicht negieren. Das sind 100 Kinder, 60 Kinder auf dem Rekord, die die gleiche Sache erklären. Du denkst, sie planen das einfach? Ja. Du denkst, es gibt keine mögliche Möglichkeit. Es gab einen Kind, der sagte, okay, ja, wir haben es gemacht. 110 Prozent. Du konntest das nicht organisieren. Nein.
A lot of his colleagues weren't respecting the work he was doing at all. They were not about it. They didn't love what he was doing. But he just kept diving into it. They no joke had the school investigate him. Even when they had nothing, like no clause, whatever. It never had happened before. But they had no evidence to do this. They had no reason to do it. But yet he was under investigation.
A lot of his colleagues weren't respecting the work he was doing at all. They were not about it. They didn't love what he was doing. But he just kept diving into it. They no joke had the school investigate him. Even when they had nothing, like no clause, whatever. It never had happened before. But they had no evidence to do this. They had no reason to do it. But yet he was under investigation.
A lot of his colleagues weren't respecting the work he was doing at all. They were not about it. They didn't love what he was doing. But he just kept diving into it. They no joke had the school investigate him. Even when they had nothing, like no clause, whatever. It never had happened before. But they had no evidence to do this. They had no reason to do it. But yet he was under investigation.
They prove that you can look into whatever you want at the end of the day, but just don't let it affect other things. So it goes on and he keeps going deeper and deeper. He gets on to Oprah Winfrey, on Larry King. He's talking about it, pushing it like crazy. And then one night, walking around outside of London in the streets, he gets hit by a drunk driver and dies. Out of nowhere.
They prove that you can look into whatever you want at the end of the day, but just don't let it affect other things. So it goes on and he keeps going deeper and deeper. He gets on to Oprah Winfrey, on Larry King. He's talking about it, pushing it like crazy. And then one night, walking around outside of London in the streets, he gets hit by a drunk driver and dies. Out of nowhere.
They prove that you can look into whatever you want at the end of the day, but just don't let it affect other things. So it goes on and he keeps going deeper and deeper. He gets on to Oprah Winfrey, on Larry King. He's talking about it, pushing it like crazy. And then one night, walking around outside of London in the streets, he gets hit by a drunk driver and dies. Out of nowhere.
But the really, really strange thing is... On that exact same day in England where he was, three other men named John Mack also died.