Jared Isaacman
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
The Colorado Supreme Court is such a mess that they said it was constitutional.
Everybody forgets.
Democrats tried to take Trump off the ballot in Colorado.
Supreme Court said you can do this.
The United States Supreme Court said 9-0, you can't.
It's hard to get 9-0.
I know.
Even Jackson.
Think about that.
It kind of gave you a sense that there was a discomfort with her being on the Supreme Court where a lot of times they're very collegial relationships, even across different perspectives on how to apply constitutional jurisprudence.
That's a great example.
They were very good friends, even though intellectually they disagreed very often.
There was an acceptance of a principal disagreement on how to apply the law across, to Buck's point, Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both very smart and had different readings.
Elena Kagan, I think that there are a lot of people out there who say, hey, I may not agree with her renderings of judgment, but I trust the intellectual heft that she is bringing to bear on those opinions.
When Amy Coney Barrett, Buck, I thought it was very significant.
Amy Coney Barrett does not seem like the kind of person who wants to take a two-by-four to people very often.
She seems like what she is, a mom who tries to be kind.
And some of her responses to Katonji Brown Jackson were the equivalent, judicially, of just throwing your hands up in the air and saying, I can't even stomach these arguments.
They're embarrassing.
They don't recognize any past precedent.