Jason Jorjani

And this is exactly the same place where we find these blasted megalithic structures on the surface of Mars. So there's a nuclear war on Mars. So Brandenburg's thesis is that there was a nuclear war on Mars.

And this is exactly the same place where we find these blasted megalithic structures on the surface of Mars. So there's a nuclear war on Mars. So Brandenburg's thesis is that there was a nuclear war on Mars.

And this is exactly the same place where we find these blasted megalithic structures on the surface of Mars. So there's a nuclear war on Mars. So Brandenburg's thesis is that there was a nuclear war on Mars.

It would definitely have been a contributing factor. I want to come around to what I think might have been another factor in that. Okay. But definitely would have been a contributing factor. But we were on about the moon. So why am I going on this detour to Mars? Yeah. Because when you put Brandenburg's research next to what Joe McMoneagle saw.

It would definitely have been a contributing factor. I want to come around to what I think might have been another factor in that. Okay. But definitely would have been a contributing factor. But we were on about the moon. So why am I going on this detour to Mars? Yeah. Because when you put Brandenburg's research next to what Joe McMoneagle saw.

It would definitely have been a contributing factor. I want to come around to what I think might have been another factor in that. Okay. But definitely would have been a contributing factor. But we were on about the moon. So why am I going on this detour to Mars? Yeah. Because when you put Brandenburg's research next to what Joe McMoneagle saw.

And by the way, while we're on this subject, Ingo Swann was also tasked, independently of Joe McMoneagle, to look at Mars twice. Once was in 1976, I think, and the other was in 1984, same year that McMoneagle did his, But Swan's team and McMoneagle were unaware of each other. Obviously, this makes sense as protocol. They wanted two sets of remote viewers on the same target to get corroboration.

And by the way, while we're on this subject, Ingo Swann was also tasked, independently of Joe McMoneagle, to look at Mars twice. Once was in 1976, I think, and the other was in 1984, same year that McMoneagle did his, But Swan's team and McMoneagle were unaware of each other. Obviously, this makes sense as protocol. They wanted two sets of remote viewers on the same target to get corroboration.

And by the way, while we're on this subject, Ingo Swann was also tasked, independently of Joe McMoneagle, to look at Mars twice. Once was in 1976, I think, and the other was in 1984, same year that McMoneagle did his, But Swan's team and McMoneagle were unaware of each other. Obviously, this makes sense as protocol. They wanted two sets of remote viewers on the same target to get corroboration.

And Swan did his with a whole team of people. McMoneagle worked alone at the Monroe Institute. Swan had like five or six people working with him. And in 1984, and also in the viewing in, I think, 76 or so, Ingo Swann and his team described exactly the same thing as Joe McMoneagle. They described a civilization on Mars.

And Swan did his with a whole team of people. McMoneagle worked alone at the Monroe Institute. Swan had like five or six people working with him. And in 1984, and also in the viewing in, I think, 76 or so, Ingo Swann and his team described exactly the same thing as Joe McMoneagle. They described a civilization on Mars.

And Swan did his with a whole team of people. McMoneagle worked alone at the Monroe Institute. Swan had like five or six people working with him. And in 1984, and also in the viewing in, I think, 76 or so, Ingo Swann and his team described exactly the same thing as Joe McMoneagle. They described a civilization on Mars.

most of which was in ruins and was vastly ancient, but other parts of which still survived under the surface.

most of which was in ruins and was vastly ancient, but other parts of which still survived under the surface.

most of which was in ruins and was vastly ancient, but other parts of which still survived under the surface.

He described a honeycomb of cities under the surface of Mars and some structures on the surface, which were like relaying information and being used as transportation beacons and had been built by this civilization that is still active under the surface of Mars, cities that are subterranean. So, okay, but this all came from out of discussing the moon.

He described a honeycomb of cities under the surface of Mars and some structures on the surface, which were like relaying information and being used as transportation beacons and had been built by this civilization that is still active under the surface of Mars, cities that are subterranean. So, okay, but this all came from out of discussing the moon.

He described a honeycomb of cities under the surface of Mars and some structures on the surface, which were like relaying information and being used as transportation beacons and had been built by this civilization that is still active under the surface of Mars, cities that are subterranean. So, okay, but this all came from out of discussing the moon.

When you put the remote viewing data next to Brandenburg's thesis, what it suggests, oh, and Brandenburg, his estimation was that this nuclear event in Cydonia took place maybe 100 million years ago. Maybe 100 million years ago.

When you put the remote viewing data next to Brandenburg's thesis, what it suggests, oh, and Brandenburg, his estimation was that this nuclear event in Cydonia took place maybe 100 million years ago. Maybe 100 million years ago.