Jason Jorjani

In 300 something years, we're going to wind up with a moon's mass worth of data on the earth. And what's worse is that like 20 years after that, I think it was 20 years exactly after that, we wind up with an Earth's worth of mass on the Earth. It will go from weighing equal to the moon to weighing equal to the Earth itself, which means at that point, the planet will be completely torn apart.

In 300 something years, we're going to wind up with a moon's mass worth of data on the earth. And what's worse is that like 20 years after that, I think it was 20 years exactly after that, we wind up with an Earth's worth of mass on the Earth. It will go from weighing equal to the moon to weighing equal to the Earth itself, which means at that point, the planet will be completely torn apart.

sure or in con maybe we like tap into you know some sort of consciousness and we store everything there you could build super massive structures out of like nano materials and whatever potentially to do something like this yeah here's what i want to go somewhere else with this where i want to go with this in simulation theory right so so think a little bit about this like you accumulate this much data and this is what it would do to the earth right

sure or in con maybe we like tap into you know some sort of consciousness and we store everything there you could build super massive structures out of like nano materials and whatever potentially to do something like this yeah here's what i want to go somewhere else with this where i want to go with this in simulation theory right so so think a little bit about this like you accumulate this much data and this is what it would do to the earth right

sure or in con maybe we like tap into you know some sort of consciousness and we store everything there you could build super massive structures out of like nano materials and whatever potentially to do something like this yeah here's what i want to go somewhere else with this where i want to go with this in simulation theory right so so think a little bit about this like you accumulate this much data and this is what it would do to the earth right

And, um, you, uh, so you, if you weigh a hard drive before you record data on it, it weighs less than after you record data on it. Okay. But we can't see this mass. I mean, you, you open up, suppose you're one of these very technically adept computer geeks and you take the, uh, you know, you take the screwdriver to your computer opener. Where the fuck is the mass? You can't see it.

And, um, you, uh, so you, if you weigh a hard drive before you record data on it, it weighs less than after you record data on it. Okay. But we can't see this mass. I mean, you, you open up, suppose you're one of these very technically adept computer geeks and you take the, uh, you know, you take the screwdriver to your computer opener. Where the fuck is the mass? You can't see it.

And, um, you, uh, so you, if you weigh a hard drive before you record data on it, it weighs less than after you record data on it. Okay. But we can't see this mass. I mean, you, you open up, suppose you're one of these very technically adept computer geeks and you take the, uh, you know, you take the screwdriver to your computer opener. Where the fuck is the mass? You can't see it.

Even in these giant servers, 340 years from now, once there's a moon's worth of mass in terms of information on the Earth, you can't see it inside the servers. Is there any other example of mass that we can't see in the universe? Yeah, it's called dark matter. Okay. I got it. Here's where it gets creepy, man. Here's where it gets really creepy. So how was dark matter discovered?

Even in these giant servers, 340 years from now, once there's a moon's worth of mass in terms of information on the Earth, you can't see it inside the servers. Is there any other example of mass that we can't see in the universe? Yeah, it's called dark matter. Okay. I got it. Here's where it gets creepy, man. Here's where it gets really creepy. So how was dark matter discovered?

Even in these giant servers, 340 years from now, once there's a moon's worth of mass in terms of information on the Earth, you can't see it inside the servers. Is there any other example of mass that we can't see in the universe? Yeah, it's called dark matter. Okay. I got it. Here's where it gets creepy, man. Here's where it gets really creepy. So how was dark matter discovered?

It was discovered through three different types of experiments in the 1970s. First, in the early 1970s, when we started to be able to observe galaxies, we noticed that they don't obey the spin rate that they should according to Newtonian mechanics. According to Newtonian physics...

It was discovered through three different types of experiments in the 1970s. First, in the early 1970s, when we started to be able to observe galaxies, we noticed that they don't obey the spin rate that they should according to Newtonian mechanics. According to Newtonian physics...

It was discovered through three different types of experiments in the 1970s. First, in the early 1970s, when we started to be able to observe galaxies, we noticed that they don't obey the spin rate that they should according to Newtonian mechanics. According to Newtonian physics...

Since most of the mass of the galaxy is concentrated toward the center of the galaxy, the inside of a galaxy should be spinning at a faster rate than the outer arms are. That's not what we see. We see a mostly even spin rate in galaxies. So that really got the physicists scratching their head.

Since most of the mass of the galaxy is concentrated toward the center of the galaxy, the inside of a galaxy should be spinning at a faster rate than the outer arms are. That's not what we see. We see a mostly even spin rate in galaxies. So that really got the physicists scratching their head.

Since most of the mass of the galaxy is concentrated toward the center of the galaxy, the inside of a galaxy should be spinning at a faster rate than the outer arms are. That's not what we see. We see a mostly even spin rate in galaxies. So that really got the physicists scratching their head.

This suggests for most of the visible galaxy to be spinning at the same rate, it would mean that there's a lot of mass outside of the galaxy that's distorting or flattening the spin rate. Then they made another kind of observation of distant galaxies that has to do with the refraction of light. So we have galaxies that are further from us and galaxies that are closer to us.

This suggests for most of the visible galaxy to be spinning at the same rate, it would mean that there's a lot of mass outside of the galaxy that's distorting or flattening the spin rate. Then they made another kind of observation of distant galaxies that has to do with the refraction of light. So we have galaxies that are further from us and galaxies that are closer to us.

This suggests for most of the visible galaxy to be spinning at the same rate, it would mean that there's a lot of mass outside of the galaxy that's distorting or flattening the spin rate. Then they made another kind of observation of distant galaxies that has to do with the refraction of light. So we have galaxies that are further from us and galaxies that are closer to us.