Jason Jorjani

And in that metaphor, the laser being shown on the holographic film is consciousness.

Yeah, so for example, in the double slit experiment, right? When the laser... particle beam, whatever, is not being observed, and it passes through the double slits and registers on the photographic film as a waveform, right? Meaning that it passed through the double slits as a probability distribution of whether it would go through one slit or the other. That's like a piece of holographic film

Yeah, so for example, in the double slit experiment, right? When the laser... particle beam, whatever, is not being observed, and it passes through the double slits and registers on the photographic film as a waveform, right? Meaning that it passed through the double slits as a probability distribution of whether it would go through one slit or the other. That's like a piece of holographic film

Yeah, so for example, in the double slit experiment, right? When the laser... particle beam, whatever, is not being observed, and it passes through the double slits and registers on the photographic film as a waveform, right? Meaning that it passed through the double slits as a probability distribution of whether it would go through one slit or the other. That's like a piece of holographic film

without a laser being shown on it, where all you see are swirls in the film. In a true hologram, when you look at a holographic film, you can't see any image in it. It's a bunch of swirls. Right. You need the laser beam to shine on it for the image to pop out.

without a laser being shown on it, where all you see are swirls in the film. In a true hologram, when you look at a holographic film, you can't see any image in it. It's a bunch of swirls. Right. You need the laser beam to shine on it for the image to pop out.

without a laser being shown on it, where all you see are swirls in the film. In a true hologram, when you look at a holographic film, you can't see any image in it. It's a bunch of swirls. Right. You need the laser beam to shine on it for the image to pop out.

That's like observation in the double-slit experiment, where consciousness is akin to the laser beam that's being shown on the hologram.

That's like observation in the double-slit experiment, where consciousness is akin to the laser beam that's being shown on the hologram.

That's like observation in the double-slit experiment, where consciousness is akin to the laser beam that's being shown on the hologram.

So what Bohm and then Talbot were saying is that it's consciousness that makes the universe pop out to us as a phenomenal experience. From out of code, from out of mathematical wave functions. Right. In an information processing system.

So what Bohm and then Talbot were saying is that it's consciousness that makes the universe pop out to us as a phenomenal experience. From out of code, from out of mathematical wave functions. Right. In an information processing system.

So what Bohm and then Talbot were saying is that it's consciousness that makes the universe pop out to us as a phenomenal experience. From out of code, from out of mathematical wave functions. Right. In an information processing system.

Exactly. You ask that question. On the other side of two, three hundred years of conditioning in a reductionist mechanistic physical model from the time of Newton onward, where it's expected that consciousness should be explained as a phenomenon reducible to some kind of physical mechanism.

Exactly. You ask that question. On the other side of two, three hundred years of conditioning in a reductionist mechanistic physical model from the time of Newton onward, where it's expected that consciousness should be explained as a phenomenon reducible to some kind of physical mechanism.

Exactly. You ask that question. On the other side of two, three hundred years of conditioning in a reductionist mechanistic physical model from the time of Newton onward, where it's expected that consciousness should be explained as a phenomenon reducible to some kind of physical mechanism.

Well, if Wheeler was right in his interpretation of this information theory that we were talking about, beginning with Claude Shannon, continuing with Rolf Landauer, if Wheeler's interpretation that it comes- What was Wheeler's first name? John. John Archibald Wheeler. Okay, by the way, he had security clearances and worked with people deep in the deep state.

Well, if Wheeler was right in his interpretation of this information theory that we were talking about, beginning with Claude Shannon, continuing with Rolf Landauer, if Wheeler's interpretation that it comes- What was Wheeler's first name? John. John Archibald Wheeler. Okay, by the way, he had security clearances and worked with people deep in the deep state.

Well, if Wheeler was right in his interpretation of this information theory that we were talking about, beginning with Claude Shannon, continuing with Rolf Landauer, if Wheeler's interpretation that it comes- What was Wheeler's first name? John. John Archibald Wheeler. Okay, by the way, he had security clearances and worked with people deep in the deep state.

including on the UFO subject, secretly. So this goes to your question, like, what does it do to your worldview when you know this shit about how the universe works?