Javier Milei

There are many anarcho-capitalists who are dedicated to criticizing and incredibly they do so with more violence towards liberals and many of them actually criticize me which truly make no sense because it is precisely the nirvana fallacy. But The reality is that, look, in Argentina, for example, the most popular sport is soccer. When you go to watch an Argentina match, it is beautiful.

The stands are full and they're all painted with sky blue and white colors. There is a lot of joy. People sing songs that are very fun, that are very distinctive. Very, it's very much part of Argentine folklore, so to speak. But you see, that beautiful show is external. That is to say, it does not determine the outcome.

The stands are full and they're all painted with sky blue and white colors. There is a lot of joy. People sing songs that are very fun, that are very distinctive. Very, it's very much part of Argentine folklore, so to speak. But you see, that beautiful show is external. That is to say, it does not determine the outcome.

The stands are full and they're all painted with sky blue and white colors. There is a lot of joy. People sing songs that are very fun, that are very distinctive. Very, it's very much part of Argentine folklore, so to speak. But you see, that beautiful show is external. That is to say, it does not determine the outcome.

You place the ball in the middle of the field and no matter how much people shout, the ball doesn't move. The one who moves the ball and scores the goals is messy. So what do I mean? If you don't get involved and don't get into it, No, you don't do anything.

You place the ball in the middle of the field and no matter how much people shout, the ball doesn't move. The one who moves the ball and scores the goals is messy. So what do I mean? If you don't get involved and don't get into it, No, you don't do anything.

You place the ball in the middle of the field and no matter how much people shout, the ball doesn't move. The one who moves the ball and scores the goals is messy. So what do I mean? If you don't get involved and don't get into it, No, you don't do anything.

So, I mean, what do I know is that there are many liberals, libertarians and anarcho-capitalists who are really useless because all they do is criticize, let's say, those of us who want to lead the world toward the ideas of freedom. And what they don't realize is that power is a zero-sum game. And if we don't have it, then the left will have it.

So, I mean, what do I know is that there are many liberals, libertarians and anarcho-capitalists who are really useless because all they do is criticize, let's say, those of us who want to lead the world toward the ideas of freedom. And what they don't realize is that power is a zero-sum game. And if we don't have it, then the left will have it.

So, I mean, what do I know is that there are many liberals, libertarians and anarcho-capitalists who are really useless because all they do is criticize, let's say, those of us who want to lead the world toward the ideas of freedom. And what they don't realize is that power is a zero-sum game. And if we don't have it, then the left will have it.

Therefore, if you level your harshest criticism at those in your own ranks, you end up being subservient to socialism, probably. And also, for instance, you have cases of strong hypocrisy, let's say. I have seen cases of agorists. I mean... It's the anarcho-capitalists who criticize Rothbard because he said that you have to get into politics, otherwise the socialists will advance.

Therefore, if you level your harshest criticism at those in your own ranks, you end up being subservient to socialism, probably. And also, for instance, you have cases of strong hypocrisy, let's say. I have seen cases of agorists. I mean... It's the anarcho-capitalists who criticize Rothbard because he said that you have to get into politics, otherwise the socialists will advance.

Therefore, if you level your harshest criticism at those in your own ranks, you end up being subservient to socialism, probably. And also, for instance, you have cases of strong hypocrisy, let's say. I have seen cases of agorists. I mean... It's the anarcho-capitalists who criticize Rothbard because he said that you have to get into politics, otherwise the socialists will advance.

And it's interesting because some of them, I have seen them criticizing, proposing agorism. And I remember one of them, one day, the police showed up and honestly, he was peeing himself. So, I mean, it's very easy to criticize, propose and suggest But if he was truly such an agonist, he should have been willing to endure going to jail.

And it's interesting because some of them, I have seen them criticizing, proposing agorism. And I remember one of them, one day, the police showed up and honestly, he was peeing himself. So, I mean, it's very easy to criticize, propose and suggest But if he was truly such an agonist, he should have been willing to endure going to jail.

And it's interesting because some of them, I have seen them criticizing, proposing agorism. And I remember one of them, one day, the police showed up and honestly, he was peeing himself. So, I mean, it's very easy to criticize, propose and suggest But if he was truly such an agonist, he should have been willing to endure going to jail.

However, when it was time to face the consequences of the idea he was promoting, he froze, wet his pants, and ended up, let's say, accepting all the restrictions because, clearly, it was better to be out of jail than in jail. But in doing so, he sold out his ideas. So it seems to me that no... not taking into account the restrictions

However, when it was time to face the consequences of the idea he was promoting, he froze, wet his pants, and ended up, let's say, accepting all the restrictions because, clearly, it was better to be out of jail than in jail. But in doing so, he sold out his ideas. So it seems to me that no... not taking into account the restrictions

However, when it was time to face the consequences of the idea he was promoting, he froze, wet his pants, and ended up, let's say, accepting all the restrictions because, clearly, it was better to be out of jail than in jail. But in doing so, he sold out his ideas. So it seems to me that no... not taking into account the restrictions

of the situation only serves to be functional to socialism because all it does is strike against one's own.