JD Vance

It's that the governor of a state could utter that phrase without recognizing how fundamentally subjective it is.

Or Hillary Clinton saying that we want to censor misinformation.

She has come out and explicitly said that we have to censor disinformation and misinformation.

Like, hey, you're not supposed to have total control over discourse.

That's the whole point.

We don't want people to have total control.

And they can utter it without the American media going completely bananas.

Just suggest there's something broken about the political culture of the left.

I mean, there are people on CNN and CBS and all these other sort of mainstream networks.

I would call them corporate networks.

All these corporate networks that will say, you know, when Donald J. Trump says that if you riot after the election, you're the enemy of the people or you're an enemy within, like that is a major threat to democracy.

But Hillary Clinton saying that we should censor disinformation, they're just, yeah, no big deal.

And the fact that they can get so fired up about what I think is a pretty common sense observation that if you riot, law enforcement should have a response to it.

But they think that it's the end of the – they don't care at all.

They don't care at all when Hillary Clinton and Tim Walz endorse explicit censorship.

That should scare the hell out of us.

Yes.

It was so obvious.

I mean, the whole argument for the start of COVID that wasn't from the Wuhan lab was basically, as I understood it, that a bat had gotten a weird coronavirus and had fallen into a guy's soup.

at a wet market.