JD Vance

Right.

Just accept that it was a mistake.

It's not that efficient.

The political or the environmental costs are pretty significant.

You know, solar, I think, is actually a little bit more reasonable because you can get a lot more of the power.

They last a little bit longer.

They're not nearly as ugly.

And you can put them in places where people don't frankly want to live that much anyway, like in deserts and things like that.

Tesla does a solar roof, which is fantastic.

I think that's a great way, right?

That's just empty space.

But wind, I think we just should say this was a failed experiment.

We're going to stop subsidizing this.

And if people want to have a wind turbine, great.

But we're not going to build miles and miles of wind turbines anymore, at least not with taxpayer subsidy.

It's totally bananas.

And again, it's we focus on the carbon footprint thing.

And we don't talk about the fact that there are these massive environmental hazards that goes back to the distracted politics versus the real stuff.

And we should be talking about the real environmental consequences of wind power.

Well, and you deal with it technologically, right?