Jean-Baptiste Kempf

For them, it means to get hacked.

The way I would look at it personally is a little bit like the padlock on your home.

Not everyone... The padlock on your home, or the lock on your home, is there to protect against the...

capabilities of what it's there to protect.

It's not there to protect nuclear secrets.

It's not there to protect Fort Knox.

And it could be looked at that they're using AI at a level of scale to go and pick those locks and then say, hey, your lock's not secure.

You need to deal with this.

Whereas actually they're the ones with resources

to be able to fix this, but that seems to not be something either they'll contribute to in terms of patches or in terms of financially.

And the scale of AI is kind of the issue that the...

The bug reports are very wordy.

They're very, very, it's almost a denial of service by AI generated bug reports on very niche codecs.

And the other issue the security community has is everything is marked high priority.

You're going to, you know, this is the most important thing in the world and you need to deal with this.

High, high, high, vulnerable, scary, scary, scary.

on a game codec used on one disc in 1993.

And that's where the dichotomy lies.

Going around telling everyone that their padlock's not safe, well, that's a hobby project of somebody.

The safety of that codec is consummate to what that person thinks.